I couldn't find my response to an earlier post of
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 57)
Posted On: 12/09/2018 1:21:27 PM
I couldn't find my response to an earlier post of yours on this subject, so I used a broader brush to slam your benighted views.
It was not only to the point, it was to the root point of your many silly posts on this subject..
The next bit of silliness?
Really, you believe that there is a % of people who either learn or choose to become homosexual?
Do you remember making such a choice?
Exactly. NO one remembers making a choice for the simple and self-evident reason that it's NOT a matter of choice.
Save, I suppose, for an infinitesimal % of bisexuals who DO make choices.
Seriously, why is there a bug up your ass on this subject? The disproportionality of your expressed 'concerns to the actual numbers is...………………………..….curious.
It was not only to the point, it was to the root point of your many silly posts on this subject..
The next bit of silliness?
Quote:
naturally homosexual
Really, you believe that there is a % of people who either learn or choose to become homosexual?
Do you remember making such a choice?
Exactly. NO one remembers making a choice for the simple and self-evident reason that it's NOT a matter of choice.
Save, I suppose, for an infinitesimal % of bisexuals who DO make choices.
Seriously, why is there a bug up your ass on this subject? The disproportionality of your expressed 'concerns to the actual numbers is...………………………..….curious.
Quote:
Thank you Hawks for your response to my open question.
My percent is slightly different from yours
3.4 % compared to your 3.8 % naturally homosexual
.
You used a pointed article to answer - but thanks anyway.
The question wasn't about perceptions of homo actvity.
You used the occasion to voice stuff as usual.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼