I guess you set a low bar based upon experience on
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 228)
Posted On: 12/08/2018 4:18:43 PM
I guess you set a low bar based upon experience on that board.
Please read the post I was responding to, and then read mine to learn what was left out of that piece on the 'gifts'.
I knew that gifts had to be turned in, for obvious reasons.
And the implication that the Obamas would simply keep the 'loot' is ridiculous.
The 'Obama Sucks Filter' is employed by some, which results in the posting of misinformation and the silliest of conspiracy theories.
Yes, including the 'birther' shit.
Anyway this was a doozy, and so easy to fact-check.
That's another thing that the OS Filter precludes it's users from doing.
(All of the righty posts are easy to fact check for that matter..
Invariably they link to laughably right wing sites that check out as badly biased and as careless with the truth.
Everybody likes a 'story' so the notion that the big bad mainstream media are missing all of these great stories is hilarious.
That's the silly lead; 'why wasn't this covered?'. You find out it usually was or there wasn't sufficient confirmation to print anything.
You know, it's called journalism.)
A dishonest post intended to mislead. I believe that is on the list of IH TOS 'violations' .
'Likely'? Slam dunk for much of what you will read here.
Please read the post I was responding to, and then read mine to learn what was left out of that piece on the 'gifts'.
I knew that gifts had to be turned in, for obvious reasons.
And the implication that the Obamas would simply keep the 'loot' is ridiculous.
The 'Obama Sucks Filter' is employed by some, which results in the posting of misinformation and the silliest of conspiracy theories.
Yes, including the 'birther' shit.
Anyway this was a doozy, and so easy to fact-check.
That's another thing that the OS Filter precludes it's users from doing.
(All of the righty posts are easy to fact check for that matter..
Invariably they link to laughably right wing sites that check out as badly biased and as careless with the truth.
Everybody likes a 'story' so the notion that the big bad mainstream media are missing all of these great stories is hilarious.
That's the silly lead; 'why wasn't this covered?'. You find out it usually was or there wasn't sufficient confirmation to print anything.
You know, it's called journalism.)
A dishonest post intended to mislead. I believe that is on the list of IH TOS 'violations' .
Quote:
Contributors must not....
- be likely to deceive any person.
'Likely'? Slam dunk for much of what you will read here.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼