Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Quantum Materials Corp. (QTMM) Message Board

The 'conversion efficiency' numbers might not cove

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (2)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 22465
(Total Views: 387)
Posted On: 12/03/2018 4:26:16 PM
Posted By: ddHawk
Re: Puravida19 #11063
The 'conversion efficiency' numbers might not cover all the bases in the overall comparative LCOE equations, but it does serve a purpose in being the one number & a basis for communication that the average Joe-on-the-street can wrap his head around. With that in-mind, I'd suggest that a metric middleground should be submitted so some clarity can be established...instead of this hodge-podge of diverse factors being the only thing we have to go by. In the abscense of any other viable metric to accomplish this, I submit that a suitable middleground metric might be in the form of 'comparative 24hr outputs', resulting in 'one' single number for the 'average' conversion efficiency over a 24hr period. I make no claims at being a math wizard, & I'm certain some other folks adept at analytics could illustrate this far better, but for the sake of discussion, let me propose the following hypothetical example for a side-by-side comparisons on an ideal summer day.
*Brand-S...convention silicon solar panel puts out an avg 18% CE over an 8hr period, then goes dark for the remaing 16hrs.
...or....18x8=144 units total over 24hrs.
*Brand-Q...QDSC panel puts out an avg 12% CE for 8hrs, then a 4% CE avg from IR & UV during the remaining 16hrs.
...or....12x8=96 units + 4x16=64....96+64=160 units total over 24hrs.
**As mentioned, I could easily be wrong, but for the lack of something else better that I can wrap my head around, this example seems rational to me...& if viable, or something similar, might be of value to fill-in the void of understanding for laymen investors, like me anyway


(3)
(0)




Quantum Materials Corp. (QTMM) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us