The wise point you make is to "not care" about suc

The wise point you make is to "not care" about such a rating. And no it has nothing to due with SC audit or financials. These are computer generated and I have yet to be told wait it was based on. Oddly, Investars keeps lowering the reliability rating on the negative MSCI recommendation over time. When it first came out it showed about a 52% reliability, a little better than a coin toss, now at 46%, who would think it is credible? Why post a negative rating that does not have credibility? As a long term Fidelity investor I am challenging them as to why they would publish such garbage. The day the negative rating came out the stock dropped 10%. To me this is irresponsible on Fidelity's part. Rory's legal team is aware of this and waiting for my findings, but getting straight answers is taking time. My priority is to publish some interactive videos and every day I have new ideas that can help friends in both non-profits and business. Just hope Rory has enough Rocket Fuel for what is coming (just kidding). Thanks for your intelligent question. I only regret I missed the Black Friday sale on Fusz gear. and Best to you. Check this out for a scientific look on the topic we are discussing: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article...5X10001546