You take a not completed investigation that noneth
Post# of 65629
And you have to be pretty damned naïve to not take Russian interference in the '16 election, as concluded by ALL of the intelligence agencies, together with Putin's EXPRESSED preference for Trump's election, as not evidence of Russian help.
Considering how easily you convict others with far less evidence, your new more stringent 'legal standards' are simply not credible.
Every thing I accurately described, if it applied to a president Clinton, would have you calling for Hillary's impeachment and shipment to GITMO.
Your hypocrisy and double standards are limitless.
Quote:
He is extremely frustrated and angry that he has failed after $40 MILLION and almost TWO years to find any proof.

