jcr53, thanks for your response. FWIW, I just can'
Post# of 75002
As for CJCLIve, I am not yet persuaded of the merits of this partnership. I worked for an early version of CJCLive many years ago. It went belly-up. Any business that presents itself as a complex disruptive system has a big hill to climb. I've heard the podcast and visited the website and I still don't have a clear vision as to how the company functions. Which is one of the problems they're facing. People won't buy what they don't understand. Is CJCLive buying the product and selling it to the MLM distributors to re-sell? How do the distributors pay for the product, in crypto? What is the relationship between MLM-distribution and regular-distribution, which John Rustin (I think I have the name right) also said he has (I think)? Is MLM the hook that will draw in new customers, in management's vision? Why would I as a customer choose to pay $300 for access to a closed market when I can promote myself just fine on FB and YouTube? These are just some of the questions I have.
My personal jury's out on this partnership. If it works, great. If it doesn't, it's not any worse than a sale that didn't close, i.e., a loss of possible revenue. That's what has this jury basically okay with moving forward with the partnership. There are probably not big consequences (other than disappointment) if it doesn't pan out.
I'm a bit concerned that Michael has drunk some Kool-Aid here.
Go ahead, reassure me! Or explain to me! (And I hope the Board doesn't delete this.)