The Perfect Opportunity for a Federal Investigation into Obama’s “Long-form” Birth Certificate
COULD “THE BIRTHERS” HAVE THE LAST LAUGH?
Why are there different versions of Obama’s purported long-form birth certificate?
(Nov. 9, 2018) — According to mainstream media sources, Michelle Obama’s forthcoming book contains a section wherein the former purported First Lady criticizes Donald Trump for having raised the issue of where her husband, Barack Hussein Obama, was born, and by extension, his constitutional eligibility to serve as president.
But could her book have unintended consequences?
In early 2011, then-businessman Trump publicly questioned why the Obama White House had not released his “long-form” birth certificate to prove his claim that he was born in the United States and presumably qualified for the presidency as a “natural born Citizen.”
In response, the mainstream media excoriated Trump, calling him a “racist,” as Michelle Obama’s book reportedly implies.
Anyone else who questioned Obama’s bona fides despite credible reports of his foreign birth fell into the same category, later labeled “the Birthers.”
However, a five-year criminal investigation, which the media refused to cover in any depth, revealed that the long-form image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 is a “computer-generated forgery.” Supportive of that conclusion are two forensic analysts who examined the image at length from two respective forensic disciplines and found it lacking.
No media outlet further examined the findings of forgery and fraud first announced by lead investigator Mike Zullo on March 1, 2012. Similarly, the media and FBI yawned when Zullo followed up the first press conference with another on July 17, 2012 with more detail as to how investigators believe the forgery was created.
A third and final presser on December 15, 2016 went under-reported after Zullo revealed the conclusions of the two forensic document analysts and how items from an existing, paper Hawaii birth certificate were copied, lifted and placed on the Obama “long-form” forgery created for public consumption.
Perhaps Trump desires current House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to take over the Speaker’s gavel in January because her signature appears on nomination forms from 2008 certifying that Barack Hussein Obama was qualified for the position he was seeking.
Although aware of the numerous reports of Obama’s foreign birth and the birth certificate forgery, neither Congress nor the FBI lifted a finger to discover why a fraudulent image was posted on an official government website “with the intent to deceive,” according to Zullo.
On Wednesday, the day after the midterm elections, Attorney General Jeff Sessions resigned at Trump’s request, followed by the appointment and swearing-in of Acting Attorney General Michael Whitaker. Given Michelle Obama’s raising of the issue in a book which could garner her millions, what better time could there be than now for the acting Attorney General of the United States to order the FBI to open an investigation into the long-form birth certificate forgery to reach the truth?
Isn’t that what the FBI does?
The criminal probe also declared Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration form to be fraudulent, a claim then-Selective Service System director Lawrence Romo, an Obama appointee, refused to examine. That, too, could be investigated, as Romo himself suggested at the time.
Trump knows that elements within the CIA, FBI, Justice Department and other government agencies “colluded” to sabotage his campaign and frame a number of his appointees and advisors.
Zullo has said in radio interviews that former CIA Director John Brennan is a central figure in the appearance of the long-form birth certificate.
Is it therefore too far a stretch, or any stretch at all, that the intelligence community not only invented the “Russia collusion” narrative which has dogged the Trump administration, inflated by leftist media types, but also participated in the creation of the birth certificate and Selective Service forgeries?
Is it not time that Trump, with a new Justice Department head, used the capabilities of the executive branch to find and expose the truth?
Could “the Birthers” have the last laugh after all?
https://www.thepostemail.com/2018/11/09/the-p...rtificate/
COULD “THE BIRTHERS” HAVE THE LAST LAUGH?
Why are there different versions of Obama’s purported long-form birth certificate?
(Nov. 9, 2018) — According to mainstream media sources, Michelle Obama’s forthcoming book contains a section wherein the former purported First Lady criticizes Donald Trump for having raised the issue of where her husband, Barack Hussein Obama, was born, and by extension, his constitutional eligibility to serve as president.
But could her book have unintended consequences?
In early 2011, then-businessman Trump publicly questioned why the Obama White House had not released his “long-form” birth certificate to prove his claim that he was born in the United States and presumably qualified for the presidency as a “natural born Citizen.”
In response, the mainstream media excoriated Trump, calling him a “racist,” as Michelle Obama’s book reportedly implies.
Anyone else who questioned Obama’s bona fides despite credible reports of his foreign birth fell into the same category, later labeled “the Birthers.”
However, a five-year criminal investigation, which the media refused to cover in any depth, revealed that the long-form image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 is a “computer-generated forgery.” Supportive of that conclusion are two forensic analysts who examined the image at length from two respective forensic disciplines and found it lacking.
No media outlet further examined the findings of forgery and fraud first announced by lead investigator Mike Zullo on March 1, 2012. Similarly, the media and FBI yawned when Zullo followed up the first press conference with another on July 17, 2012 with more detail as to how investigators believe the forgery was created.
A third and final presser on December 15, 2016 went under-reported after Zullo revealed the conclusions of the two forensic document analysts and how items from an existing, paper Hawaii birth certificate were copied, lifted and placed on the Obama “long-form” forgery created for public consumption.
Perhaps Trump desires current House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to take over the Speaker’s gavel in January because her signature appears on nomination forms from 2008 certifying that Barack Hussein Obama was qualified for the position he was seeking.
Although aware of the numerous reports of Obama’s foreign birth and the birth certificate forgery, neither Congress nor the FBI lifted a finger to discover why a fraudulent image was posted on an official government website “with the intent to deceive,” according to Zullo.
On Wednesday, the day after the midterm elections, Attorney General Jeff Sessions resigned at Trump’s request, followed by the appointment and swearing-in of Acting Attorney General Michael Whitaker. Given Michelle Obama’s raising of the issue in a book which could garner her millions, what better time could there be than now for the acting Attorney General of the United States to order the FBI to open an investigation into the long-form birth certificate forgery to reach the truth?
Isn’t that what the FBI does?
The criminal probe also declared Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration form to be fraudulent, a claim then-Selective Service System director Lawrence Romo, an Obama appointee, refused to examine. That, too, could be investigated, as Romo himself suggested at the time.
Trump knows that elements within the CIA, FBI, Justice Department and other government agencies “colluded” to sabotage his campaign and frame a number of his appointees and advisors.
Zullo has said in radio interviews that former CIA Director John Brennan is a central figure in the appearance of the long-form birth certificate.
Is it therefore too far a stretch, or any stretch at all, that the intelligence community not only invented the “Russia collusion” narrative which has dogged the Trump administration, inflated by leftist media types, but also participated in the creation of the birth certificate and Selective Service forgeries?
Is it not time that Trump, with a new Justice Department head, used the capabilities of the executive branch to find and expose the truth?
Could “the Birthers” have the last laugh after all?
https://www.thepostemail.com/2018/11/09/the-p...rtificate/
2
