Based on what was written in the PR, it sounds lik
Post# of 11802
![](/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
"However, upon analysis, it appears that the trial judge's ruling ignored the entirety of DECN's principal arguments and handed J&J a victory by incorrectly ruling that DECN made claims in its pleadings and arguments about its system and patents that are wrong. The judge's ruling ignored a comparison between the accused (J&J) system and our system, and instead incorrectly compared our patented system to itself."
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)