Show me proof SFOR can afford #1 PI attorney in Ro
Post# of 82672
(Total Views: 432)
Posted On: 10/29/2018 6:14:09 PM
Show me proof SFOR can afford #1 PI attorney in Ropes & Grey
I think you can reason this out, if they couldn't afford elite PI attorney Blank Rome and Blank Rome felt secure taking on SFOR as a client working on contingency basis, what makes you think they could afford R&G or that R&G wpi;d dop the same thing. Is it wrong to do? Is it unethical? Or simply does the case have to be strong enough to merit that kid of risk for the law firm? If that was the case for Blank Rome why not Ropes and Grey? They are both Elite?
I know R&G went over everything SFOR for a few months before working for them. R&G realized the amount of money involved with them most of the fortune 500 are infringing.
I know they opened an office near silicon valley to handle infringers on the west coast.
If you feel SFOR could pay for all the above , show me the proof that would truly be amazing. If they couldn't afford them, like they could afford Blank Rome what would be your conclusion, you know, if they don't have the money to pay?
I guess it would come down to the strength of SFORs case, and that has already been discussed. I guess it would come down to if you believe SFOR has a strong Patents or not.
Let me though you a bone, Cisco for Duo will pay between 300 to 500 million dollars in treble (triple) damages. Ropes and Grey would get half of it , between 150 and 250 million on contingency. Think thats not enticing enough for them to go that route?
SFOR is going to have many such payments. And for some of these companies its chicken feed.
Do you think R&G was not aware of those type numbers before signing on with SFOR? Were they not aware Blank Rome was on contingency , another elite law firm on contingency Or the amount of lawsuits that would be involved , over several years?
Believe what you will , I am not compelled to provide you any more then the above.!
Blessings!
I think you can reason this out, if they couldn't afford elite PI attorney Blank Rome and Blank Rome felt secure taking on SFOR as a client working on contingency basis, what makes you think they could afford R&G or that R&G wpi;d dop the same thing. Is it wrong to do? Is it unethical? Or simply does the case have to be strong enough to merit that kid of risk for the law firm? If that was the case for Blank Rome why not Ropes and Grey? They are both Elite?
I know R&G went over everything SFOR for a few months before working for them. R&G realized the amount of money involved with them most of the fortune 500 are infringing.
I know they opened an office near silicon valley to handle infringers on the west coast.
If you feel SFOR could pay for all the above , show me the proof that would truly be amazing. If they couldn't afford them, like they could afford Blank Rome what would be your conclusion, you know, if they don't have the money to pay?
I guess it would come down to the strength of SFORs case, and that has already been discussed. I guess it would come down to if you believe SFOR has a strong Patents or not.
Let me though you a bone, Cisco for Duo will pay between 300 to 500 million dollars in treble (triple) damages. Ropes and Grey would get half of it , between 150 and 250 million on contingency. Think thats not enticing enough for them to go that route?
SFOR is going to have many such payments. And for some of these companies its chicken feed.
Do you think R&G was not aware of those type numbers before signing on with SFOR? Were they not aware Blank Rome was on contingency , another elite law firm on contingency Or the amount of lawsuits that would be involved , over several years?
Believe what you will , I am not compelled to provide you any more then the above.!
Blessings!
(7)
(0)Zerify Inc (ZRFY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼