I don't agree based on silence alone. If they were
Post# of 2219
(Total Views: 245)
Posted On: 10/24/2018 6:38:15 PM
I don't agree based on silence alone. If they were overwhelmed, it seems to me we wouldn't be seeing so much evidence on YouTube that it was more the result of knee-jerk planning and execution on the part of the state and county officials that has caused so much delay.
Between the complexity of the rules/regulations, the lack of proper guidance, and the sudden changes they've made to those rules/regs and the tax laws, it's no wonder they have seen a 90% rate of failure. Still, if SIGO was failing, I think the share structure and debt would be far, far worse that what actually looks sweet as honey for any start up company.
Also, they are already compliant with track and trace, so why would you think they are overwhelmed because they aren't overly concerned with investor relations? I think they'd be putting much more effort into investor relations if they were needing to sell stock to fund ongoing operations, but it doesn't appear to be the case.
Ground floor investment is never without risk. You can't win if you don't play, so I'm in.
Between the complexity of the rules/regulations, the lack of proper guidance, and the sudden changes they've made to those rules/regs and the tax laws, it's no wonder they have seen a 90% rate of failure. Still, if SIGO was failing, I think the share structure and debt would be far, far worse that what actually looks sweet as honey for any start up company.
Also, they are already compliant with track and trace, so why would you think they are overwhelmed because they aren't overly concerned with investor relations? I think they'd be putting much more effort into investor relations if they were needing to sell stock to fund ongoing operations, but it doesn't appear to be the case.
Ground floor investment is never without risk. You can't win if you don't play, so I'm in.
(2)
(0)