No I wouldn’t agree. These so called “petty”

No I wouldn’t agree. These so called “petty” timeline factors are significant. Once again, the financials are unaudited and it wouldn’t be the first time a CEO in the otc cooked the books in regard to revenue. There is a bigger trail you are missing here. We are potentially talking about the validity and integrity of Steve Berman’s character!! Do you notice he continually has a hiccup in following through with any of his claims? Do you notice that? There was suppose to be a name/ticker change, right? Oh, but the delay is with FINRA! Later we find out there are several obstacles that need to be addressed prior. DELAWARE debt being a BIG one!!! Oh let me guess, that hasn’t been paid yet because SB thought he was going to be able to step around it?!?! If the distracted driving app is as successful as stated in SB’s revenue numbers, then the first priority SB should have addressed with revenue and when he sold personal shares should have been the Delaware debt and not putting payment toward purchasing an MJ company that no one can identify. You want to talk about the move to Colorado? You want to talk about the reduction in shares? You want to talk about audited financials? None of it can happen because obstacles stand in the way! You want to talk about the lack of follow up in identifying who the private label deal is with? These stated intentions could easily be a bag of lies. “Petty” timeline, I don’t think so. This is the otc and SB has put his own foot up his a$$! I would suggest contacting SB and pinning him down to addressing these issues with follow through and not more Twitter fluff.