In re-reading the Perovskite PR, I discerned a dif

In re-reading the Perovskite PR, I discerned a difference in the claims for their Indium core Cad-free QD and their new Perovskite QD.
Perovskite PR here
Quote:
As a phosphor replacement in flat panel displays, PQDs have the potential to provide industry best color gamut picture qualities due to their extremely narrow emission wavelength profile. For comparison, todays industry leading low cadmium or cadmium free QLED displays can only deliver roughly an 80% Rec 2020 coverage while PQDs have the ability to deliver roughly a 98% Rec 2020 coverage (with properties that include: PLQY>95%, FWHM <25 nm and adjustable peak position).

If their Indium-core QD are comparable to present industry capability of " 80% Rec 2020 coverage" and if QMC Perovskite QD are capabile of "roughly a 98% Rec 2020 coverage", then QMC can produce an 80% product (Indium-core) for the low-end market, comparable to Nanosys quality, and a high-end premium Rec 2020 (Peroskite QD) product for the high-end.

So for those asking for specs, Rec 2020 requires High Efficiency QD for brightness (PLQY>95%) and wide color gamut from a very narrow bandwidth (FWHM<25%). QMC seems confident they can meet those specs, IMO.