not to step into this back and forth .. but remember NR (non retail) desperately needs *volume* to return on IPIX .. this is why i posted out a month ago the YTD
*volume* on IPIX was @ 33M (EO August) .. which was running 10M~ less than the EO August 2017 YTD totals .. not exactly what NR wanted revealed .. if one looks @ 2015 IPIX/CTIX 10 day vol avgs were running then (with a far higher PPS) between 500k to 600k .. one of the facts the distort and deflect crew do is focus on X but not on Y .. when there is *selling* of significance there is *volume* (consistently) of significance .. today NR managed to eek out 3 back to back days of *volume* on IPIX .. but note %s that had to be marked because of that *eeking* over the same 3 days .. NR is literally stuck (which is why *legal* is at almost historically high levels on IPIX) .. NR needs retail traders (not trading crews) to re-enter IPIX .. relentless PPS compression on cliff diving volume doesn't engender retail traders .. but it does engender investors comfortable with their risk/reward tolerance and DD .. and that is NRs' *issue* re: IPIX in a nut shell
now 3 days a pattern doesn't make .. and imo because NR is *stuck* in a hole of their own making for *years* .. they have to try and get volume avgs UP *consistently* and do what i refer to as mini controlled take ups on the PPS to entice OTC retail traders .. willing to come in and trade significant *volume* daily
imo based on % marked .. it's mostly NR currently .. that may change going forward .. but 3 days of *volume* with a PPS *increase more frequently than a decrease* will engender retails' attention
note that IPIX's 52 week low reset yet again today (159) .. my bids remain JIC NR goes off script tomorrow (up vs down)
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5232683
4kids
There are various theories about who is selling. One is: short-sellers. Another is: Aspire.
YOU, sox, have espoused the Aspire theory.
If Aspire is mad because they didn't get offered this financing deal, they might decide to just sell out their position.
You are basing your argument on unproven assumptions. You are assuming that the Family Office is going for a short-term gain rather than wanting to hold for the longer term. There is no evidence for that. There is no evidence that they are pushing stock price down, though certainly it would be to their benefit to do that. But, their price is based on a 10-day average stock price. Do they have enough stock to keep this up for 10 days?
*volume* on IPIX was @ 33M (EO August) .. which was running 10M~ less than the EO August 2017 YTD totals .. not exactly what NR wanted revealed .. if one looks @ 2015 IPIX/CTIX 10 day vol avgs were running then (with a far higher PPS) between 500k to 600k .. one of the facts the distort and deflect crew do is focus on X but not on Y .. when there is *selling* of significance there is *volume* (consistently) of significance .. today NR managed to eek out 3 back to back days of *volume* on IPIX .. but note %s that had to be marked because of that *eeking* over the same 3 days .. NR is literally stuck (which is why *legal* is at almost historically high levels on IPIX) .. NR needs retail traders (not trading crews) to re-enter IPIX .. relentless PPS compression on cliff diving volume doesn't engender retail traders .. but it does engender investors comfortable with their risk/reward tolerance and DD .. and that is NRs' *issue* re: IPIX in a nut shell
now 3 days a pattern doesn't make .. and imo because NR is *stuck* in a hole of their own making for *years* .. they have to try and get volume avgs UP *consistently* and do what i refer to as mini controlled take ups on the PPS to entice OTC retail traders .. willing to come in and trade significant *volume* daily
imo based on % marked .. it's mostly NR currently .. that may change going forward .. but 3 days of *volume* with a PPS *increase more frequently than a decrease* will engender retails' attention
note that IPIX's 52 week low reset yet again today (159) .. my bids remain JIC NR goes off script tomorrow (up vs down)
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5232683
4kids
There are various theories about who is selling. One is: short-sellers. Another is: Aspire.
YOU, sox, have espoused the Aspire theory.
If Aspire is mad because they didn't get offered this financing deal, they might decide to just sell out their position.
You are basing your argument on unproven assumptions. You are assuming that the Family Office is going for a short-term gain rather than wanting to hold for the longer term. There is no evidence for that. There is no evidence that they are pushing stock price down, though certainly it would be to their benefit to do that. But, their price is based on a 10-day average stock price. Do they have enough stock to keep this up for 10 days?
