Based on past experience listening to Mark's inter

Based on past experience listening to Mark's interviews, I think this tweet can be read in more than one way, especially in light of SFOR not actually currently being listed on the November arguments calendar. I don't think his speaking or writing is always fully in sync with his thoughts. The grammar gets weird at times. I've noticed this on several occasions.

Here is his tweet again.
https://twitter.com/strikeforcetech/status/10...47200?s=21
"As i always said, we have no call as to when our appeal is discussed but it is currently on the November schedule in the courts, which doesn't mean it will be. Yes, very exciting."

Face value take away;
It's on the schedule but might not be.

That is IMO a really unclear message. It seems a bit like these quotes which a lot of people seem to enjoy.
https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/yogi_berra

An downbeat interpretation;
Can't discuss appeal. The courts have posted the November arguments calendar. We don't know when we will be scheduled. We are excited.

An upbeat interpretation but a big stretch since he doesn't comment on the court;
Can't discuss appeal. It's on the court workload in November. We don't know if it will be scheduled for oral argument. We are excited.

IMO people will read what they want to read in his tweet, but he does clearly say it's exciting which I liked to see. However I still place my expectations for the appeal to now be heard in December at the earliest, and I will be pleasantly surprised if it comes earlier. Yes my expectations are a moving timeline pushed further out with each month of argument calendaring that doesn't have SFOR on it.


I hope at least people find the Yogi Bear quotes entertaining.

There are no guarantees in investing. No one should consider these pages or posts to be financial advice. Everyone has a responsibility to verify and thoroughly learn more than what is referenced or written here, and everyone must take responsibility for their own investing decisions.