Listen to this all of it ,,,, WOW the Dem party is in deep manure if he is correct
comments on Steve Bannon interview with ABC woman, who kept interrupting Bannon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8BGvG3pPfo
First time I have seen Bannon speak. He can mix it with anyone not just because he is brilliant, but because everything he says he believes in and has thought out. He doesn't have to avoid answering anything as he has a natural answer for everything. That is because he is authentic. Politicians who lie come across as fake, Bannon comes across as real. He should have told her he was giving her his time and if she continued to interrupt he would walk. She said don't lump me with them and yet she was exactly like them. I love the way Bannon explained that when they don't have any argument they just say the magic words, racist, bigot, hate, far right sort of words and she then proceeded to mention those words, knowing that by doing that, she was admitting she had no argument. He was so comfortable in the interview that he told her she was good. She is probably smart enough to realize he was saying that from a position of winner being respectful to his demolished opponent. Have read many comments, all on Bannon's side and saying she was awful. It's rude to keep interrupting and a clear sign of hostility. Also a sign of frustration that Bannon was demolishing her with his answers and she wanted to stop him. Make the World Great Again!
........................................
I disagree. She changed the subject with new questions as he was answering her previous question so well. She got frustrated he was answering so well and interrupted him to try trip him up with a different question. She tried to rattle him by rapidly introducing many new questions while he was still in the process of answering her previous question, but he either finished his answer, or answered her new question with ease. She was aggressive, hostile and unfriendly. She spoke rapidly, not calmly. Interviews are supposed to be balanced, not a one sided attempted hit job. Her only "good job" was in her negative strategy of trying to rattle him by rapidly speaking, interrupting him, and introducing new questions in an attempt to try prevent him finishing answering her previous questions. It was water off a duck's back to Bannon.
comments on Steve Bannon interview with ABC woman, who kept interrupting Bannon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8BGvG3pPfo
First time I have seen Bannon speak. He can mix it with anyone not just because he is brilliant, but because everything he says he believes in and has thought out. He doesn't have to avoid answering anything as he has a natural answer for everything. That is because he is authentic. Politicians who lie come across as fake, Bannon comes across as real. He should have told her he was giving her his time and if she continued to interrupt he would walk. She said don't lump me with them and yet she was exactly like them. I love the way Bannon explained that when they don't have any argument they just say the magic words, racist, bigot, hate, far right sort of words and she then proceeded to mention those words, knowing that by doing that, she was admitting she had no argument. He was so comfortable in the interview that he told her she was good. She is probably smart enough to realize he was saying that from a position of winner being respectful to his demolished opponent. Have read many comments, all on Bannon's side and saying she was awful. It's rude to keep interrupting and a clear sign of hostility. Also a sign of frustration that Bannon was demolishing her with his answers and she wanted to stop him. Make the World Great Again!
........................................
I disagree. She changed the subject with new questions as he was answering her previous question so well. She got frustrated he was answering so well and interrupted him to try trip him up with a different question. She tried to rattle him by rapidly introducing many new questions while he was still in the process of answering her previous question, but he either finished his answer, or answered her new question with ease. She was aggressive, hostile and unfriendly. She spoke rapidly, not calmly. Interviews are supposed to be balanced, not a one sided attempted hit job. Her only "good job" was in her negative strategy of trying to rattle him by rapidly speaking, interrupting him, and introducing new questions in an attempt to try prevent him finishing answering her previous questions. It was water off a duck's back to Bannon.
