We agree on several fronts. I find the pumping, e

We agree on several fronts. I find the pumping, equally as troublesome as the bashing. To me, they're two sides of the same coin. I don't take anything that is posted by either side as fact. The truth is, 90 - 99% of what has been said by anyone on the boards, regardless of which side of the debate they find themselves on, is speculation at best, or deliberate falsehoods at worst. No one, other than the actual players, knows anything for certain. Though I do tend to find the back and forth entertaining when kept light and civil.

I also believe that the company is responsible to a large degree, for the share price at any given time. Their actions, or the lack thereof, directly leads to investor sentiment and as such, share price.

I am definitely red here, with a very obtainable break even point. Having said that, as with any gamble, which is absolutely what this level of trading is, I waved good-bye to that money everytime I bought shares. I know there are lots of people who bought in with money that was not disposable, and I am very sympathetic to the situation. I have the luxury of time. It's like a lotto ticket. At the end of the day, I am still here because I believe there to be significant upside potential from these levels. I do not believe the company to be some kind of deliberate share selling scheme. I think they are actually trying to accomplish some type of business operations, which even if ultimately unsuccessful, the journey to failure should take the price North of where it currently resides. If on the other hand, they succeed with any degree, the potential upside far outweighs the cost of this going to no bid, at least for me.

I do still find the idea of the good fairies of the OTC, here to help keep investors informed, at no personal gain to themselves, a bit absurd and frankly insulting to our collective intelligence.

I truly hope that no one, for or against, ever makes trading decisions based on what was said on an internet message board.