Many of the "investors" posting on LieHub are paid
Post# of 2219
(Total Views: 273)
Posted On: 09/17/2018 8:30:15 AM
Many of the "investors" posting on LieHub are paid to find fault, and if they can't find any, they invent it.
If a company shares only a fraction of the details, even if not entirely through fault of their own, those paid bashers are more than happy to supply nervous/doubtful investors with a hearty helping of bull shit details in the absence of real details.
They've done it with the very best of companies to run the OTC gauntlet. They don't answer for their lies later on when it's obvious how phony they are, they just move on to the next victim.
If they get dogged bad enough by those who are willing to take the time to repeatedly expose them for what they are, they just give the known alias a vacation and pick up where they left off with an alternative or new alias.
Knowing that, I choose to stay away and not help them out, even if only by giving them my traffic. Due to the corrupt ownership, most efforts to challenge them end in defeat anyhow, so for me it's a waste of time all together.
I haven't seen them selling a bunch of stock to line their pockets, and they even locked up their shares for a few years. No signs of fraud, just more red tape than most start ups deal with and an unfortunate reliance on government officials and auditors both of whom were slow and uncertain. It's coming, and it would appear it's pretty close at this point.
If a company shares only a fraction of the details, even if not entirely through fault of their own, those paid bashers are more than happy to supply nervous/doubtful investors with a hearty helping of bull shit details in the absence of real details.
They've done it with the very best of companies to run the OTC gauntlet. They don't answer for their lies later on when it's obvious how phony they are, they just move on to the next victim.
If they get dogged bad enough by those who are willing to take the time to repeatedly expose them for what they are, they just give the known alias a vacation and pick up where they left off with an alternative or new alias.
Knowing that, I choose to stay away and not help them out, even if only by giving them my traffic. Due to the corrupt ownership, most efforts to challenge them end in defeat anyhow, so for me it's a waste of time all together.
I haven't seen them selling a bunch of stock to line their pockets, and they even locked up their shares for a few years. No signs of fraud, just more red tape than most start ups deal with and an unfortunate reliance on government officials and auditors both of whom were slow and uncertain. It's coming, and it would appear it's pretty close at this point.
(2)
(0)