I wonder why Mueller never charged Carter Page.
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 200)
Posted On: 09/14/2018 11:34:15 PM
I wonder why Mueller never charged Carter Page.
I don't think Mueller wants to put him on the stand and have him testify how he was set up!
We knew from the latest texts from the adulterous lovers that they planted fake items in the press to make Page look bad.
Former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged text messages several months before the 2016 election that suggest the pair were writing an op-ed together and that the FBI seemingly “authorized” a Washington Post story on potential Russian interference during the November elections.
On Sept. 2, 2016, Page texts Strzok about writing an op-ed: “Got it. But we are still writing the op-ed, yes?”
Strzok replies, “Yes, ish. He said too much data would be good to identify the key pieces of data and frame it in an argument, but not to spend ‘too much time on the opening or closing.’ I told him we were too much of perfectionists to not do all of it.”
On September 5, 2016, Page sends Strzok a link to the Washington Post article written by some FBI agent!
Strzok replies, “This is the one (redacted) was talking about I think.”
Page then says, “Yup. It is very well sourced. 100% authorized.”
Strzok then tells Page, “Just read the article. We say a lot of the same things. I guess that’s O.K.”
Page writes back “Yeah, but that’s why ours is going to need to be more folksy. So it’s not like a news article.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national...50c9782cd6
https://saraacarter.com/breaking-page-and-str...on-russia/
I don't think Mueller wants to put him on the stand and have him testify how he was set up!
We knew from the latest texts from the adulterous lovers that they planted fake items in the press to make Page look bad.
Former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged text messages several months before the 2016 election that suggest the pair were writing an op-ed together and that the FBI seemingly “authorized” a Washington Post story on potential Russian interference during the November elections.
On Sept. 2, 2016, Page texts Strzok about writing an op-ed: “Got it. But we are still writing the op-ed, yes?”
Strzok replies, “Yes, ish. He said too much data would be good to identify the key pieces of data and frame it in an argument, but not to spend ‘too much time on the opening or closing.’ I told him we were too much of perfectionists to not do all of it.”
On September 5, 2016, Page sends Strzok a link to the Washington Post article written by some FBI agent!
Strzok replies, “This is the one (redacted) was talking about I think.”
Page then says, “Yup. It is very well sourced. 100% authorized.”
Strzok then tells Page, “Just read the article. We say a lot of the same things. I guess that’s O.K.”
Page writes back “Yeah, but that’s why ours is going to need to be more folksy. So it’s not like a news article.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national...50c9782cd6
https://saraacarter.com/breaking-page-and-str...on-russia/
(1)
(0)