So now you claimed my English is excellent for a non-native speaker? I thought you recommended me to go to English class? If you think I'm an American who pretends otherwise, then say it loud here, don't beat around the bush like Keltoi. I don't really care whether you believe me or not, but please go out and travel outside Trump's Great America, especially in the East side of the world, and you'll realize how many people who could actually speak and write good English on top of their own vernacular language (shame on you Americans who could only speak English!). In China, there are more English speakers than the US.
I'm surprise that you're dissecting my comments words by words like a Sherlock Holmes. I hope you could instead spend your time dissecting the company's 10K/ 10Q/ 8K filings and press releases with more rigor than my comments here which bear no consequences to the company's success or failure.
You shouldn't even use the word hypothesizing because there's no hypothesis here about this stock. Hypothesis is based on science. Speculation is a better word. Everyone speculates. Your buddy Dynabolic speculated that IPIX will be a multi-billion biotech by 2025 (but based on zero evidence or reason), and that's fine by your standard? Nobody will know the outcome, we can only speculate based on company's actions or "mis-actions". What's wrong with that?
So who else is selling the shares apart from Aspire and Aruda? Or you're very much in the short crowd like AlanC? There's this English term, Occam's razor, which means simplest solution tends to be the right one. The recent raise at $0.25 is exactly the reason why we keep breaching the support price and instead of castigating the management, you choose to bash me and bullied others (Squar) online.
Imagine you're Ehrlich, on almost zero cash, needs to pay bills here and there, and wants money, who do you think is the one in a lesser position? Aspire or Ehrlich? Begging is a harsh word here, but I'm sure Ehrlich would have to ask Aspire in a nice way for money.
Sox has been explaining this many times, yet he was bullied by Keltoi, and you as a moderator, turned a blind eye. Why? This board is a hallmark of cyber bullying to the tee.
We are now in one of the longest bull runs in history. Federal Reserve has been raising the rates and the dollar has been strengthening for some time. This has and always been one of the turning points in the market based on historical precedence which may cause the next bear market- rising interest rate. It is also causing havoc in other parts of the world right now, like Turkey, Venezuela and Italy. Is this a reasonable comment? I don't see how it's a flat-out "sky is falling". The signs are there, all it takes is a trigger. It's an exaggeration on your part for describing my comment as such.
Yeah, just one biotech. Which one? Name it or are you just merely copied and pasted that line from somewhere. Back in 2008, pretty much all stocks are in red including biotech. Cellceutix's progress was stagnant without much progress during that time, so financial market situation will have an impact on all companies irregardless. So which comment is more reasonable or plausible here, mine or yours (for commenting "one biotech double on market crash"
?
As much as you like to label people liar or soft-basher, I don't see how yourself is a paragon of truth and a democrat. I tends to listen to both sides and let the people decides, whereas you likes to shutdown others and conjures a lot of fairy tales like shorting, multi-identities, paid bashing, etc. And if you think I wrote this long rebuttal for a price, you'll be dead wrong. As much as I want to see this company succeed, I don't see how your style here could help others do their due diligence about this company.
I'm surprise that you're dissecting my comments words by words like a Sherlock Holmes. I hope you could instead spend your time dissecting the company's 10K/ 10Q/ 8K filings and press releases with more rigor than my comments here which bear no consequences to the company's success or failure.
Quote:For instance, hypothesizing something that no one knows, claiming knowledge that no one has in the first paragraph ....
You shouldn't even use the word hypothesizing because there's no hypothesis here about this stock. Hypothesis is based on science. Speculation is a better word. Everyone speculates. Your buddy Dynabolic speculated that IPIX will be a multi-billion biotech by 2025 (but based on zero evidence or reason), and that's fine by your standard? Nobody will know the outcome, we can only speculate based on company's actions or "mis-actions". What's wrong with that?
Quote:Then there is the claim that the share price is due only to Aspire selling (untrue) and making it sound as if Mr. Ehrlich had to beg an unwilling Aspire to buy shares in the first place (also untrue).
So who else is selling the shares apart from Aspire and Aruda? Or you're very much in the short crowd like AlanC? There's this English term, Occam's razor, which means simplest solution tends to be the right one. The recent raise at $0.25 is exactly the reason why we keep breaching the support price and instead of castigating the management, you choose to bash me and bullied others (Squar) online.
Imagine you're Ehrlich, on almost zero cash, needs to pay bills here and there, and wants money, who do you think is the one in a lesser position? Aspire or Ehrlich? Begging is a harsh word here, but I'm sure Ehrlich would have to ask Aspire in a nice way for money.
Sox has been explaining this many times, yet he was bullied by Keltoi, and you as a moderator, turned a blind eye. Why? This board is a hallmark of cyber bullying to the tee.
Quote:And then we have just a flat-out "the sky is falling" statement.
We are now in one of the longest bull runs in history. Federal Reserve has been raising the rates and the dollar has been strengthening for some time. This has and always been one of the turning points in the market based on historical precedence which may cause the next bear market- rising interest rate. It is also causing havoc in other parts of the world right now, like Turkey, Venezuela and Italy. Is this a reasonable comment? I don't see how it's a flat-out "sky is falling". The signs are there, all it takes is a trigger. It's an exaggeration on your part for describing my comment as such.
Quote:On the day of the great stock market crash of 1987, one biotech was up almost double on good news, as the market itself crashed horribly.
Yeah, just one biotech. Which one? Name it or are you just merely copied and pasted that line from somewhere. Back in 2008, pretty much all stocks are in red including biotech. Cellceutix's progress was stagnant without much progress during that time, so financial market situation will have an impact on all companies irregardless. So which comment is more reasonable or plausible here, mine or yours (for commenting "one biotech double on market crash"
? As much as you like to label people liar or soft-basher, I don't see how yourself is a paragon of truth and a democrat. I tends to listen to both sides and let the people decides, whereas you likes to shutdown others and conjures a lot of fairy tales like shorting, multi-identities, paid bashing, etc. And if you think I wrote this long rebuttal for a price, you'll be dead wrong. As much as I want to see this company succeed, I don't see how your style here could help others do their due diligence about this company.
1
1
