Petemanx Looking for this? Cellceutix Phase 2 T

Petemanx Looking for this?

Cellceutix Phase 2 Trial of Prurisol for Mild to Moderate Psoriasis Meets Primary Endpoint
Clinical efficacy demonstrated in the highest dose (200mg) comparator arm
Compound shown to be safe and well-tolerated with a dose-related response
Oral delivery often preferred among patients, increasing adherence to treatment
Additional studies planned in moderate to severe psoriasis and eczema
BEVERLY, MA–(Marketwired – May 24, 2016) - Cellceutix Corporation (OTC: CTIX) (the “Company”), a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company developing innovative therapies with oncology, dermatology, antibiotic, and anti-inflammatory applications, is pleased to inform shareholders that topline data from the Company’s Phase 2 FDA trial of orally-administered Prurisol in the treatment of mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis have been compiled and reviewed. The trial successfully achieved its primary endpoint, further validating Prurisol’s potential as a novel oral treatment for psoriasis.

Study Background

Enrolling 115 patients, the placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial tested the efficacy and safety of three separate, twice-daily, dosing regimens of Prurisol—50 milligram (mg) (50mg QD), 100mg (50mg BD), and 200mg (100mg BD). All patients were assessed via the 5-point Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) scale, ranging from a score of 0 (“clear”) to a score of 4 (“severe”). The IGA scale is preferred by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is comparable to the older and more commonly used Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in evaluating psoriasis severity of patients, with many dermatologists preferring it in the clinical trial setting. Generally, an IGA score of 0/1 demonstrates a strong association with a PASI 90 score.

For more information comparing the IGA and the PASI psoriasis scoring systems, please see the link immediately below. Two additional links have been provided summarizing recent dermatological studies by Regeneron and Anacor that used the IGA scale.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354461
http://newsroom.regeneron.com/releasedetail.c...eID=963078
http://investor.anacor.com/releasedetail.cfm?...eid=921668
Entry criteria for the study required: a total Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by plaque psoriasis of 10 percent to 20 percent; a baseline IGA score of 2 (“mild”) or 3 (“moderate”); and the identification of a target psoriatic lesion with a score greater than or equal to 3 based on a different (than the IGA) lesion-specific 5-point scoring scale. Clinical signs that psoriasis is clearing typically are more noticeable in patients with a greater severity of symptoms. This translated into a rigorous and aggressive study design for the Prurisol trial.

The primary endpoint assessed was the percentage of patients achieving at least a 2-point improvement from baseline on the IGA 5-point scale as measured by visual inspection of patient lesions at the end of the 84-day (12-week) treatment period. In effect, given the entry criteria, participants had to at least obtain an IGA score of “clear” or “almost clear” skin, dropping to 0 or 1 after starting from a baseline of 2 or 3. Secondary endpoints included additional improvement measures tied to degree of patient response at various time intervals.

Results Summary

The Phase 2 Prurisol trial, while not powered to demonstrate statistical significance, was conducted to inform any future fully-powered Phase 3 trial(s) that might be merited. As a result, the study’s main goal was to provide indications of efficacy, safety and tolerability upon treating patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis via oral delivery.

Overall analyses showed Prurisol, which is being developed under the FDA’s 505(b)(2) program, to be superior to placebo in the 200mg arm. Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) further revealed an early (by week dose-related response that improved as treatment duration increased.

Evaluating the primary endpoint at 84-days (week 12) in the 200mg arm, 35.0% of the patients receiving that dose of Prurisol demonstrated clinically significant improvements compared with 16.7% of patients on placebo only. This percentage includes patient data from one site where investigator non-compliance may have occurred. Were that site to have been excluded from overall data analysis, as is done in some clinical studies (refer to the journal article linked to below, published findings from another psoriasis study), 43.7% of patients in the 200mg Prurisol arm would have met the primary endpoint. Patient responses in the 50mg and 100mg arms were statistically comparable to the placebo arm.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229025/
For purposes of direct comparison, the Prurisol trial outperformed a similarly designed Phase 2b trial in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasis conducted in 2011 by Anacor Pharmaceuticals in which a topical anti-inflammatory compound was assessed. See the link below.
http://investor.anacor.com/releasedetail.cfm?...eid=587511
Sub-population analyses further showed greater efficacy demonstrated in patients who had a baseline IGA score of 3 (“moderate”) as compared to those with a baseline score of 2 (“mild”). Some of these patients even experienced a 3-point reduction in their IGA score, going from “moderate” to “clear.” This suggests Prurisol may be more effective in treating moderate to severe psoriasis patients to a greater degree than those patients who exhibit less severe symptoms. In moderate to severe psoriasis studies, the placebo response also tends to be lower.

Regarding Prurisol’s safety profile, only a single Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was reported in the study, that being in the 50mg arm, with the type and the rate of occurrence of additional Adverse Events (AEs) similar and evenly distributed across all the three dosing arms and the placebo arm.

Additional detailed data review and analysis is underway and an end-of-Phase 2 meeting with the FDA will be requested to help determine the dose(s) and design for future studies, which may include higher dosing regimens to determine Prurisol’s maximum therapeutic effect. The Company plans to release other summary findings from this trial in the coming months, with full results anticipated to be submitted for journal publication and presentation at a future medical congress.

Investigator Comments

Cellceutix would also like to share some observations and comments from Principle Investigators (PIs) overseeing different participating clinical sites in the trial. Numerous PIs noted patients expressed a desire to have access to Prurisol following the study’s conclusion. Moreover, the Company learned that some patients were previously unsuccessfully treated with other therapies, including biologics and apremilast (Otezla®).

Included below is a sampling of responses that were authorized to be published:
“Well designed study, patients were pleased, minimal to no side effects.”
“Good tolerability was shown with very few AEs reported. Good compliance and good patient satisfaction.”
“Overall impression of the study is very positive, as well as the patients’ satisfaction.”
When asked, “Why would you choose Prurisol (should it be approved) over another oral compound for psoriasis?” and “Why would you choose Prurisol over an injectable biologic?” responses included:
“Because [Prurisol] does not cause any severe side effects. Patients dislike needles and injections because they cause pain and discomfort.”
“Patients overall prefer oral medications over injectable medication. Our experience with injectable studies for other indications has been that many subjects do not like taking them and those studies tend to be difficult compared to oral medications to recruit subjects.”
“Because of [Prurisol’s] low side effect profile.”
“Patients prefer oral treatments.”
Sponsor Comments

Cellceutix believes that the results from the Prurisol Phase 2 trial are extremely encouraging, especially for the 80 percent of psoriasis sufferers exhibiting milder symptoms of the condition. These people are more likely to switch between therapies or be off treatment altogether. Planning is underway to explore Prurisol’s potential in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and eczema , a skin condition experienced by up to 30 percent of children and 10 percent of adults. The Company is hopeful Prurisol may one day become a leading treatment for psoriasis regardless of disease severity.

Leo Ehrlich, Chief Executive Officer of Cellceutix, commented: “We had always wanted to explore Prurisol’s clinical merit, as it had excellent results in laboratory studies. We put it to the test under some of the most demanding conditions, with respect to the IGA versus PASI scoring systems; short treatment duration; low dosing levels; enrollment that included patients who were previously treated with biologics; and evaluation in mild to moderate psoriasis patients, where it can be more difficult to achieve a meaningful therapeutic effect. To see such a strong response among patients, achieving clear to almost clear skin without serious side effects—the downside of biologics—in such a short period of time, is exceptional. We would like to thank patients and investigators who participated in the study. Prurisol has taken a key step towards potentially becoming only the second oral treatment approved by the FDA for psoriasis in decades.”

Leo Ehrlich continued: “More broadly, these outstanding results are the first of what we hope are more to come as the Cellceutix pipeline continues to progress. With our three lead drugs, Prurisol, Brilacidin, and Kevetrin, now in later-stage FDA trials, each a possible first-in-class treatment, we are thrilled with what the future holds.”