I think it's a scheduling issue . . . Remember
Post# of 82690
(Total Views: 501)
Posted On: 08/21/2018 6:11:41 PM
I think it's a scheduling issue . . .
Remember with the settlements , its on the legal system for the delay Judge K s negligent handling of not following guideline messed us all up. We should already be on islands with drinks with umbrellas in them. And we will in the near
Regarding how close... and Dates
Remember the Lawyers mentioned some dates they were not available so schedules and calendars were filled. Have the judges already read the briefs to determine if Oral Arguments are necessary or not? Don't know.
Seriously the Judges may schedule the date with the lawyers present who could deliver the oral arguments to the judges there if needed, but the oral arguments are only needed for complicated cases for the benefit of the judges, to ask questions so as to get clarification on confusing points, if needed.
Whether SFORs patent is legal or not,or should it have been dismissed on the basis of ALICE101 is not complicated, as there is already a legal explanation and decision from the office of the legal brains who make up the PTAB. The lawyers requested the Oral arguments just in case it was needed.
Can the Judges review the case on their own without a court date and decide and provide the lawyers with a written decision? ? Do the lawyers have to be present when the judges render a decision, I am not sure.
However if I read him right, ZPAUL has stated , he believes they can mail a written decision to attorneys . I will take his word on it.
But I do know, it is not required to have oral argument just for the sake of having oral argument.
I believe we are a month or months away. Based on court dates floated by lawyers.
But PlanB this waiting is emotionally draining. But worth the wait. I have no doubts at all we will be some of the most successful investors in OTC in many years!
Huge PCI revs will be here soon maybe sooner than settlement money. I think we are close to both.
Remember with the settlements , its on the legal system for the delay Judge K s negligent handling of not following guideline messed us all up. We should already be on islands with drinks with umbrellas in them. And we will in the near
Regarding how close... and Dates
Remember the Lawyers mentioned some dates they were not available so schedules and calendars were filled. Have the judges already read the briefs to determine if Oral Arguments are necessary or not? Don't know.
Seriously the Judges may schedule the date with the lawyers present who could deliver the oral arguments to the judges there if needed, but the oral arguments are only needed for complicated cases for the benefit of the judges, to ask questions so as to get clarification on confusing points, if needed.
Whether SFORs patent is legal or not,or should it have been dismissed on the basis of ALICE101 is not complicated, as there is already a legal explanation and decision from the office of the legal brains who make up the PTAB. The lawyers requested the Oral arguments just in case it was needed.
Can the Judges review the case on their own without a court date and decide and provide the lawyers with a written decision? ? Do the lawyers have to be present when the judges render a decision, I am not sure.
However if I read him right, ZPAUL has stated , he believes they can mail a written decision to attorneys . I will take his word on it.
But I do know, it is not required to have oral argument just for the sake of having oral argument.
I believe we are a month or months away. Based on court dates floated by lawyers.
But PlanB this waiting is emotionally draining. But worth the wait. I have no doubts at all we will be some of the most successful investors in OTC in many years!
Huge PCI revs will be here soon maybe sooner than settlement money. I think we are close to both.
(3)
(0)