I agree with you first statement and suspect every

I agree with you first statement and suspect everyone here agrees with it. Beyond that I would disagree. It is my opinion that short sellers helped drive the price of shares up close to $5.00 and then began selling shares that they did no own, borrow or have access to. I think accumulation by shareholders was enough to offset the Aspire selling since all trials were successful. I think had the company not been under attack by short sellers the share price would have been fairly stable and the shares sold by Aspire to meet the companies needs would have been far far fewer but the steady dilution by the shorts caused the share price to drop steadily.. I posted the link to the film because it provides an excellent factual education on how these criminals are stealing investors funds. Sadly those who could benefit the most would not take the time to educate themselves. Go IPIX!!!