There is no reconstruction that was a lie told by
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 396)
Posted On: 08/15/2018 12:47:28 PM
There is no reconstruction that was a lie told by IR/S7. Bill has posted that
Quote:
Posted By: MakZak
So what your saying is there never was a share buyback from funds made from the MRVB as claimed by S7/IR
There was no Proxy giving SI control over TPAC as S7 claimed numerous times on Twitter and this board.
Also what you are saying is there was never revenue being generated in the MRVB like S7/IR has claimed during their entire reign as TPAC's IR.
So since you never said TPAC was under reconstruction I guess that was a lie as well.
I appreciate your honesty it gives holders clarity of what Frauds S7/IR/SI really are
Quote: You have seen my posts. Please point to the post that deals with any entity and their relationship to a buyback or proxy authorized, approved or even acknowledged by TPAC. As I have said now for the third time, the only statements that represent TPAC are those made by TPAC. Everything else is the view, position, posturing, claim of you and others.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=489...z52fK5Yy9U
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: MakZak #20180
As I thought I said clearly in my post, the only statements that represent TPAC are those coming from me and only from the sources I cited. Anything else is the opinion of someone else. Your statements don’t represent the positions of TPAC any more than those of others. They are pure conjecture and for the most part, wholly inaccurate. Sometimes the statements made by others actually and coincidentally do reflect the views of the company, but even a blind squirrel finds an occasional acorn.
Have a safe and Happy New Year’s celebration.
Posted By: MakZak
Thats hilarious you telling me Im incapable of telling the truth. I bet you heard that a lot in your lifetime havent you. Have you ever told the truth? You have lied to shareholders since day 1. I can name several times you lied if you would like.
As for not saying that,I never said you did. I said you outed S7/IR as a fraud. Your idiotic wordsmith tactics wont work with me. You can pretend to be the educated Lawyer and never actual commit to saying something but its still holds ground. Your words in this post would holdup in a court of law and I intend to use them for just that. You clearly posted there was no share buyback from MRVB or Proxy between SI and TPAC. Perhaps you dont understand what you said would mean S7/IR committed fraud with their constant lies on twitter and this board stating the MRVB was buying shares to be retired. Or the fact it was stated SI had a Proxy with TPAC so contracts/revenue would not be disclosed. You do understand that against the law right?
Perhaps its time you start reading your own posts because they have all been screen captured along with S7. Im sure you are aware of the civil lawsuit being filed against you and S7/IR/SI by now. And the claims that have been filed with the SEC and soon to be FBI.
Just so you understand what fraud means here is the meaning.
Quote: Fraud
A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.
Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may be called a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specific offense with certain features.
Maybe by reading your own comments posted and now understanding the meaning of fraud you will understand you did in fact out S7 as a fraud.
Quote: Posted On: 12/28/2017 2:59:22 PM
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: MakZak #20182
You have seen my posts. Please point to the post that deals with any entity and their relationship to a buyback or proxy authorized, approved or even acknowledged by TPAC. As I have said now for the third time, the only statements that represent TPAC are those made by TPAC. Everything else is the view, position, posturing, claim of you and others.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=489...z52iaTodD5
You are nothing but a lying fraud yourself Bill. You James Brown/S7/IR/SI are about to understand shareholders are not going to stand for it anymore. Your childish games of blaming others for your own failures will not work anymore.
Quote:
Posted By: MakZak
So what your saying is there never was a share buyback from funds made from the MRVB as claimed by S7/IR
There was no Proxy giving SI control over TPAC as S7 claimed numerous times on Twitter and this board.
Also what you are saying is there was never revenue being generated in the MRVB like S7/IR has claimed during their entire reign as TPAC's IR.
So since you never said TPAC was under reconstruction I guess that was a lie as well.
I appreciate your honesty it gives holders clarity of what Frauds S7/IR/SI really are
Quote: You have seen my posts. Please point to the post that deals with any entity and their relationship to a buyback or proxy authorized, approved or even acknowledged by TPAC. As I have said now for the third time, the only statements that represent TPAC are those made by TPAC. Everything else is the view, position, posturing, claim of you and others.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=489...z52fK5Yy9U
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: MakZak #20180
As I thought I said clearly in my post, the only statements that represent TPAC are those coming from me and only from the sources I cited. Anything else is the opinion of someone else. Your statements don’t represent the positions of TPAC any more than those of others. They are pure conjecture and for the most part, wholly inaccurate. Sometimes the statements made by others actually and coincidentally do reflect the views of the company, but even a blind squirrel finds an occasional acorn.
Have a safe and Happy New Year’s celebration.
Posted By: MakZak
Thats hilarious you telling me Im incapable of telling the truth. I bet you heard that a lot in your lifetime havent you. Have you ever told the truth? You have lied to shareholders since day 1. I can name several times you lied if you would like.
As for not saying that,I never said you did. I said you outed S7/IR as a fraud. Your idiotic wordsmith tactics wont work with me. You can pretend to be the educated Lawyer and never actual commit to saying something but its still holds ground. Your words in this post would holdup in a court of law and I intend to use them for just that. You clearly posted there was no share buyback from MRVB or Proxy between SI and TPAC. Perhaps you dont understand what you said would mean S7/IR committed fraud with their constant lies on twitter and this board stating the MRVB was buying shares to be retired. Or the fact it was stated SI had a Proxy with TPAC so contracts/revenue would not be disclosed. You do understand that against the law right?
Perhaps its time you start reading your own posts because they have all been screen captured along with S7. Im sure you are aware of the civil lawsuit being filed against you and S7/IR/SI by now. And the claims that have been filed with the SEC and soon to be FBI.
Just so you understand what fraud means here is the meaning.
Quote: Fraud
A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.
Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A person who is dishonest may be called a fraud. In the U.S. legal system, fraud is a specific offense with certain features.
Maybe by reading your own comments posted and now understanding the meaning of fraud you will understand you did in fact out S7 as a fraud.
Quote: Posted On: 12/28/2017 2:59:22 PM
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: MakZak #20182
You have seen my posts. Please point to the post that deals with any entity and their relationship to a buyback or proxy authorized, approved or even acknowledged by TPAC. As I have said now for the third time, the only statements that represent TPAC are those made by TPAC. Everything else is the view, position, posturing, claim of you and others.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=489...z52iaTodD5
You are nothing but a lying fraud yourself Bill. You James Brown/S7/IR/SI are about to understand shareholders are not going to stand for it anymore. Your childish games of blaming others for your own failures will not work anymore.
(3)
(2)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼