'Pinning my hopes on Amarosa'? Hardly.
Just another witness to Trump's depredations, amorality and bigotry.
Nothing she alleges will surprise anyone; least of all Mueller who probably has more tapes and intercepts of Trump conversations than Trump knows/fears.
Too bad Trumpy won't sit down with Mueller to listen to some of them.
If you define 'the show' as the alt-reality conspiracy theorizing of that hot new group, 'Shady and the Q-tips', yeah, I'm enjoying the shit out of it.
'Real criminals'? Here's how ya get em.
1. Indict
2. Trial
3. Plea deal or convict.
Ya got some catching up to do. Do you see any pattern here?
I mean of GOPER shitty, criminal behavior and hypocrisy and double standards. I do, I do!
Next 'in the barrel'; Roger Stone or Michael Cohen?
Or, as it turned out, NOT. The feckless and craven one was, however, impressed by the very strong and forceful denials of his 'handler'. Uuuhh, I love it when you are harsh with me!
Just another witness to Trump's depredations, amorality and bigotry.
Nothing she alleges will surprise anyone; least of all Mueller who probably has more tapes and intercepts of Trump conversations than Trump knows/fears.
Too bad Trumpy won't sit down with Mueller to listen to some of them.
Quote:Real criminals are about democrat conspirators
Big names, not 2 bit players like A.
Enjoy the show
If you define 'the show' as the alt-reality conspiracy theorizing of that hot new group, 'Shady and the Q-tips', yeah, I'm enjoying the shit out of it.
'Real criminals'? Here's how ya get em.
1. Indict
2. Trial
3. Plea deal or convict.
Ya got some catching up to do. Do you see any pattern here?
I mean of GOPER shitty, criminal behavior and hypocrisy and double standards. I do, I do!
Next 'in the barrel'; Roger Stone or Michael Cohen?
Quote:It’s a large number considering that the investigation has been active for only 14 months.
So far, Mueller has filed charges against five American, one Dutch and 26 Russian nationals, along with three Russian businesses. Of all those indicted, five people have pleaded guilty — including one who has already served prison time — and Paul Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, is awaiting trial. (The charges against him are related to his lobbying work, not election interference.)
Our analysis of special counsel investigations going back to Watergate shows that a majority ended without charges being filed against anyone, while others took years to produce indictments. Mueller is still working quickly compared with past investigations.
This is the second batch of Russians who have been indicted and accused of meddling with the 2016 elections in the U.S.: In February, the Justice Department filed charges against 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies in connection with a painstaking online campaign to undermine the 2016 election and support the Trump campaign.
Friday’s charges are perhaps most important because they add compelling evidence to the claim that the Russian government engaged in a coordinated effort to hack U.S. servers — a contention that had been disputed by Trump and some of his allies.
And although the indictments allege that someone close to the Trump campaign was in “regular contact” with one of the Russian hackers, we still don’t know whether members of the Trump campaign committed a crime by seeking or using the documents stolen by the Russians.
The indictment also alleges that the hacked materials were seen as an opportunity for others, including an unnamed candidate for Congress who requested stolen documents about his or her opponent.
The timing of Rosenstein’s announcement will likely have consequences, though. Rather than holding specific people accountable for their role in the hacking, the indictments may serve a larger geopolitical purpose: alerting the Russians to the fact that the U.S. government understands the extent of their interference in a major election.
Trump, who according to Rosenstein was told about the indictments in advance, will have an opportunity to reinforce that message to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s face next week, when the two leaders meet in Helsinki. Rosenstein certainly gave them plenty to talk about.
Or, as it turned out, NOT. The feckless and craven one was, however, impressed by the very strong and forceful denials of his 'handler'. Uuuhh, I love it when you are harsh with me!
