No, it won't. Redactions are to protect sources th
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 83)
Posted On: 08/06/2018 1:29:32 PM
No, it won't. Redactions are to protect sources that may still be 'in the field' working on our behalf.
The fact that the FiSA warrant was reviewed and renewed 3 times, at least, belies any notion that it was unfounded, much less illegal.
It's already been confirmed that the Steel dossier was NOT the only rationale for the warrants and that the judges who reviewed them ruled as such.
You're flailing way with misinformation which will avail you naught as the Mueller investigation proceeds.
And Mueller's investigation is just over a year and a quarter old, much shorter than Watergate, Iran-Contra and Ken Starr's investigation.
But why should you care about duration? If Trump is innocent that will be confirmed. If not, game over.
You'll view the former as good for the country, I'll feel the same about the latter.
If the FBI lost it's battle where's the news of that?
The FISA warrants have NOT been ruled illegal.
The fact that the FiSA warrant was reviewed and renewed 3 times, at least, belies any notion that it was unfounded, much less illegal.
It's already been confirmed that the Steel dossier was NOT the only rationale for the warrants and that the judges who reviewed them ruled as such.
You're flailing way with misinformation which will avail you naught as the Mueller investigation proceeds.
And Mueller's investigation is just over a year and a quarter old, much shorter than Watergate, Iran-Contra and Ken Starr's investigation.
But why should you care about duration? If Trump is innocent that will be confirmed. If not, game over.
You'll view the former as good for the country, I'll feel the same about the latter.
If the FBI lost it's battle where's the news of that?
The FISA warrants have NOT been ruled illegal.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼