Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. User Boards ›
  4. Keeping it Real Message Board

Alarmists: Human Sweating May Not < > Cool the B

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 51892
(Total Views: 168)
Posted On: 08/02/2018 5:08:25 PM
Avatar
Posted By: PoemStone
Re: Zadie #32091
Alarmists: Human Sweating May Not < >
Cool the Body in Climate Change ‘Hellscapes’

If global warming continues, a new report suggests, natural human cooling through sweat may lose its effectiveness as the environment exceeds the temperature of the human body.

An analysis of possible human adaptability to climate change by Tom Vanderbilt published this week in Medium states that savanna areas where evolutionary changes were said to have taken place were hot, “but not necessarily the wet-bulb hellscapes that some climate change models are projecting.”

When speaking of climate change impacts, many “focus on sea-level rise and how coastal dwellers will adapt,” Vanderbilt observes, while in reality “heat may be the bigger story.”

Citing climate scientists Steven Sherwood and Matthew Huber, Vanderbilt says that “if warmings of 10 degrees Celsius were really to occur in next three centuries, the area of land likely rendered uninhabitable by heat stress would dwarf that affected by rising sea level.”

In this regard, heat stress “deserves more attention as a climate change impact,” he says, especially because it will have a direct impact upon the human body.

Once a certain threshold is reached, “we can no longer cool ourselves by convection or evaporation. Our environment becomes, in effect, a steam room; sweating, our great adaptive tool, is no longer effective,” Vanderbilt warns.

Thus, if global warming predictions hold true, he says, the body’s capability for self-cooling in extreme heat may prove insufficient for new environmental scenarios.

The author says that certain studies have indicated that the “critical thermal maximum” for human beings is 35 degrees Celsius (95º F), or around skin temperature. Beyond this temperature, “any exposure for more than six hours would probably be intolerable even for the fittest of humans, resulting in hyperthermia,” or heatstroke, Vanderbilt says, citing a 2015 article by Jeremy Pal and Elfatih Eltahir in Nature Climate Change.

According to Pal and Eltahir, thanks to climate change “the deadly 35-degree threshold will increasingly be reached by the end of the century, in regions like the Persian Gulf and the densely inhabited regions around the Indus and Ganges river basins.”

And “as temperatures continue to climb and indoor air-conditioning systems are strained, some adaptive responses will begin to kick in,” Vanderbilt predicts, which could include an alteration in human organs, an evolution of human sweat “better suited for aridity,” a permanent shift in metabolism, or even becoming taller and longer limbed “so as to dissipate heat more reliably.”

Then again, one supposes that if current climate models turned out to be correct, while certain parts of the earth slowly entered a danger zone of higher temperatures, other parts of the planet would logically mutate from uninhabitable frozen wasteland into territory friendlier to human dwelling and agriculture.

Then again, average global temperatures in 2018 are on track to be slightly cooler than 2017, and 2017 was cooler than 2016.

When dealing with climate forecasts for 50 or 100 years in the future, the numbers are only as reliable as the models that generate them.



(0)
(0)




Featured stocks: Coffee Shoppe
For conservative debate: "Keeping it Real"
Game Changing stock $SHMP





Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us