I don't have twitter, or I would have responded di
Post# of 29251
(Total Views: 250)
Posted On: 07/26/2018 8:41:17 PM
Re: Tahoebound #10885
I don't have twitter, or I would have responded directly to them.
But, yes, there should be some kind of regulation on facial recognition technology, so long as it is in favor of basic privacy rights.
However, I become wary when a major corporation is calling for Government regulations, as it generally means that they wish to create the rules for the Government to enforce, and, in turn, it is used to combat competition in that field.
As far as the substance of the tweet: Everything they are tweeting about is either connected to the technology installed in their phones, or is directly tied to the company itself.
While I understand the frustration with the vagueness of their tweets, I will remain patient and satisfied that they ARE communicating, and I can see where they are going (or, at least, I can make sense of what they are doing).
They've already laid out their step by step plans in their past communications, so I am no longer looking for direct "This is what we are doing" PR's (of course, they did happen to mention, albeit very nonchalantly, that the second phone is ready, and they were doing a video for their SECOND PHONE). Accordingly, they are following their plans...and their time lines. All other dates speculated have been arbitrarily blurted out by us.
My plan is to continue to wait. This is a long play for me. 2019 or bust. I'm in no hurry.
But, yes, there should be some kind of regulation on facial recognition technology, so long as it is in favor of basic privacy rights.
However, I become wary when a major corporation is calling for Government regulations, as it generally means that they wish to create the rules for the Government to enforce, and, in turn, it is used to combat competition in that field.
As far as the substance of the tweet: Everything they are tweeting about is either connected to the technology installed in their phones, or is directly tied to the company itself.
While I understand the frustration with the vagueness of their tweets, I will remain patient and satisfied that they ARE communicating, and I can see where they are going (or, at least, I can make sense of what they are doing).
They've already laid out their step by step plans in their past communications, so I am no longer looking for direct "This is what we are doing" PR's (of course, they did happen to mention, albeit very nonchalantly, that the second phone is ready, and they were doing a video for their SECOND PHONE). Accordingly, they are following their plans...and their time lines. All other dates speculated have been arbitrarily blurted out by us.
My plan is to continue to wait. This is a long play for me. 2019 or bust. I'm in no hurry.
(6)
(0)