classic trollism .. divert/deflect .. muddy the water with other aspects that don't pertain to the topic .. because literally no two OTC targets have the same *fundamentals* (diversity >> mgmt's awareness/share structure/company's IP << does have an impact) .. and to be very clear .. after reading the IPIX board and noting *constant* drum beat of agitation (deliberate imo) .. what comes to mind is the ole' quote .. me thinks some doth protest too much ..
the irony for those of us who have been *targets*.. is that back when Finra's link first went live at the behest of the SEC in Feb 2010 (retroactive to August 2009) .. NR ... trolls ... trading crews' working SMBs .. were (and remain) threatened by this data .. because of course for almost a decade .. embeds' working daily SMBs .. noted there was no such thing as any OTC company's stock being *legally* shorted (forget abusive) .. in case some don't understand .. repetition by rote does work for a lot of *retail* .. especially when conditioned daily by those seemingly with expertise of *all aspects* pertaining to the *company*
ever notice trolls are *experts* in numerous fields .. it's another *pattern* played out daily on SMBs .. the rest of us mortals .. might claim *expertise* in one field .. but not numerous areas as NRs' crews repeatedly do ..
that is why one can see one side of one *crew* working the PRO side (the other the CON side) .. on one SMB .. and then see the exact same *crew* .. doing the opposite .. it requires reading (lots of it) and imo most don't have the time .. it's equally interesting to see when a new *expert* shows up .. prior multi/s being scrubbed happens for all sorts of reasons
i find it telling that based on my first public post on my NSS board via the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation (July 2015) .. that NRs' *seeming* response was to send a well known *muddier* and *perceived* expert re: bios ..
to begin posting .. this *troll* has been a cyber stalker of mine for years .. (2009/2010)
because of course this data (if actually understood) refutes NRs' talking points at every turn
FTDs don't mean jack shit as *reported* re: OTC stocks .. i watched a company have a *reported* 300k + FTDs .. and the *legal* (which is held 99% of the time since 2013) remain in a range of 5000 to 10000 .. pre *non reporting reporting* on this same company .. 50000 or 100k in FTDs would trigger reg sho 2x .. (prior to 2013)
i've watched an OTC company be worked by a crew .. it came public via an S1 reg (vs a R/M) and crews' actions trigger reg sho within days of OTC stock first trading .. at this point (3 years on) .. i've lost track of if it's now 8 or 9 times that NR has triggered reg sho on this *target* (in one round over 30 days) .. anyone who knows the drill of NRs' cycles of money .. knows that pattern can result in
lots of money changing hands .. last round .. one buying @ the low could gain over a $1.00 per share .. (low was just around 11c) .. if one was so inclined
or course one has to recognize whether mgmt is *cognizant* of abuse .. dilution being forced onto mgmt and how handled .. and if the company's IP can outlast and/or withstand numerous cycles
there are no guarantees .. what is crystal clear (and has been pointed out here and on the IPIX board) .. is that *volume* tells the tale .. when crew last ran IPIX (CTIX) significantly upward at the EO 2014 .. *volume* was avg'ing 500k + (90 day) .. it was actually more but that is a good reference point .. i would argue that the handoff into 2015 to the CON side of NRs' crew .. worked only in that some sold .. but not nearly what was required .. it's why *volume* avgs have gone cliff diving for well over a year plus .. all the while NRs' relentless PPS compression on IPIX .. has allowed investors (so inclined) to add ever more *shares*
but mostly what NRs' handoff and actions did *imo* was educate .. not just investors .. but mgmt too
and this is why NR is now between a rock and a hard place on IPIX
when relentless compression brings in buyers vs sellers .. it doesn't take much for NR to go UPSIDE DOWN
so for all the protestations .. and all those seemingly inaccessible *shares* available .. NR is this far away (inch) from triggering reg sho on IPIX ..
now will that change anything on the OTC .. ask all the OTC companies who've taken root on the reg sho list ..
but Innovation's mgmt has done something *unique* imo .. due to their awareness of NRs' 2015 *efforts*
and this is why my expectation (no crystal ball just logic and common sense) is that Innovation's mgmt will undertake tactics and strategies going forward
there are numerous *realities* mgmt can utilize going forward in conjunction with news
i look forward to seeing how IPIX is *handled* in *short* order
4kids
i have no doubts advice was given to Innovation's mgmt about *covering* re: name/ticker/cusip change out
as i've pointed out numerous times the *telling* response re: what was *reported* via NR re: legal from that event (June 2017) to NRs' ability to reset 52 week low (5.10.17 to 2.22.18) is crystal clear
to say nothing of showing what NR has reported on *legal* since April/May re: all those *accessible* shares
no two OTC stocks/targets *imo* can be truly compared .. but the MO in play by embedded crews working various SMBs re: cycles of money .. to say nothing of the pattern NR utilizes .. well that is more easily discerned
note the historical for IPIX to start this *trading* week .. watch YOY and *volume* avgs ..
Previous Close
07/20/2018 0.5699
52-Week High
12/06/2017 1.17
52-Week Low
06/21/2018 0.325
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks) ** duly noted
07/20/2018 -38.05%
Volume 0
Volume (10 day Average) 138,342
Volume (90 day Average) 218,084
the irony for those of us who have been *targets*.. is that back when Finra's link first went live at the behest of the SEC in Feb 2010 (retroactive to August 2009) .. NR ... trolls ... trading crews' working SMBs .. were (and remain) threatened by this data .. because of course for almost a decade .. embeds' working daily SMBs .. noted there was no such thing as any OTC company's stock being *legally* shorted (forget abusive) .. in case some don't understand .. repetition by rote does work for a lot of *retail* .. especially when conditioned daily by those seemingly with expertise of *all aspects* pertaining to the *company*
ever notice trolls are *experts* in numerous fields .. it's another *pattern* played out daily on SMBs .. the rest of us mortals .. might claim *expertise* in one field .. but not numerous areas as NRs' crews repeatedly do ..
that is why one can see one side of one *crew* working the PRO side (the other the CON side) .. on one SMB .. and then see the exact same *crew* .. doing the opposite .. it requires reading (lots of it) and imo most don't have the time .. it's equally interesting to see when a new *expert* shows up .. prior multi/s being scrubbed happens for all sorts of reasons
i find it telling that based on my first public post on my NSS board via the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation (July 2015) .. that NRs' *seeming* response was to send a well known *muddier* and *perceived* expert re: bios ..
to begin posting .. this *troll* has been a cyber stalker of mine for years .. (2009/2010)
because of course this data (if actually understood) refutes NRs' talking points at every turn
FTDs don't mean jack shit as *reported* re: OTC stocks .. i watched a company have a *reported* 300k + FTDs .. and the *legal* (which is held 99% of the time since 2013) remain in a range of 5000 to 10000 .. pre *non reporting reporting* on this same company .. 50000 or 100k in FTDs would trigger reg sho 2x .. (prior to 2013)
i've watched an OTC company be worked by a crew .. it came public via an S1 reg (vs a R/M) and crews' actions trigger reg sho within days of OTC stock first trading .. at this point (3 years on) .. i've lost track of if it's now 8 or 9 times that NR has triggered reg sho on this *target* (in one round over 30 days) .. anyone who knows the drill of NRs' cycles of money .. knows that pattern can result in
lots of money changing hands .. last round .. one buying @ the low could gain over a $1.00 per share .. (low was just around 11c) .. if one was so inclined
or course one has to recognize whether mgmt is *cognizant* of abuse .. dilution being forced onto mgmt and how handled .. and if the company's IP can outlast and/or withstand numerous cycles
there are no guarantees .. what is crystal clear (and has been pointed out here and on the IPIX board) .. is that *volume* tells the tale .. when crew last ran IPIX (CTIX) significantly upward at the EO 2014 .. *volume* was avg'ing 500k + (90 day) .. it was actually more but that is a good reference point .. i would argue that the handoff into 2015 to the CON side of NRs' crew .. worked only in that some sold .. but not nearly what was required .. it's why *volume* avgs have gone cliff diving for well over a year plus .. all the while NRs' relentless PPS compression on IPIX .. has allowed investors (so inclined) to add ever more *shares*
but mostly what NRs' handoff and actions did *imo* was educate .. not just investors .. but mgmt too
and this is why NR is now between a rock and a hard place on IPIX
when relentless compression brings in buyers vs sellers .. it doesn't take much for NR to go UPSIDE DOWN
so for all the protestations .. and all those seemingly inaccessible *shares* available .. NR is this far away (inch) from triggering reg sho on IPIX ..
now will that change anything on the OTC .. ask all the OTC companies who've taken root on the reg sho list ..
but Innovation's mgmt has done something *unique* imo .. due to their awareness of NRs' 2015 *efforts*
and this is why my expectation (no crystal ball just logic and common sense) is that Innovation's mgmt will undertake tactics and strategies going forward
there are numerous *realities* mgmt can utilize going forward in conjunction with news
i look forward to seeing how IPIX is *handled* in *short* order
4kids
i have no doubts advice was given to Innovation's mgmt about *covering* re: name/ticker/cusip change out
as i've pointed out numerous times the *telling* response re: what was *reported* via NR re: legal from that event (June 2017) to NRs' ability to reset 52 week low (5.10.17 to 2.22.18) is crystal clear
to say nothing of showing what NR has reported on *legal* since April/May re: all those *accessible* shares
no two OTC stocks/targets *imo* can be truly compared .. but the MO in play by embedded crews working various SMBs re: cycles of money .. to say nothing of the pattern NR utilizes .. well that is more easily discerned
note the historical for IPIX to start this *trading* week .. watch YOY and *volume* avgs ..
Previous Close
07/20/2018 0.5699
52-Week High
12/06/2017 1.17
52-Week Low
06/21/2018 0.325
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks) ** duly noted
07/20/2018 -38.05%
Volume 0
Volume (10 day Average) 138,342
Volume (90 day Average) 218,084
1
