bottom line is (as angst producing as it appears t

bottom line is (as angst producing as it appears to some) .. P2O remains an OTC survivor with an enviable I/O .. each mgmt team has its *negatives* and *baggage* .. and there are no doubts some of us would handle aspects differently (imo communication extremes from founder to current ceo couldn't be more visible)

but we (actual P2O investors) only control our DD .. which impacts whether we buy/sell or hold our PTOI *shares*

today courtesy of input in from about 5 minutes ago .. 40,000 picked off by longs

i get the frustration .. but nothing posted here changes *anything* .. and all of it has been posted multiple times b4

so have at it .. suspect more than a few would be very happy to have seen P2O go *poof* in August 2013 .. vs almost 5 years of sub 5c PPS .. with seemingly very little to show for it

just me perhaps .. but as long as one of the two BoD remains on the BoD and the founder retains his 3M~ PTOI shares ..

i too will remain invested .. personally i've never understood the mindset of one camped out on a SMB .. for an investment one doesn't want

as for the *comment* on abusive shorting .. it's a fact that OTC companies are targets .. especially a decade back for those who came public via a R/M .. it's equally a fact that for those rare survivors with savvy and aware mgmt teams that can execute .. the *reward* (risk/reward) to one's *risk* can be epic .. time will tell which camp .. P2O comes under


4kids

Quote:

---

Uh huh, I’ve never shied away from my input of getting Heddle as CEO. At the time he was the only option. That doesn’t mean it turned out to be a good one. It’s been a flat out disaster.

So we have a company that has “survived” with an “envious share structure “ and a “paradigm changing”technology.

What we really have is a worthless company, a worthless stock, and multiple almost, coulda, woulda, deals that never materialize. A CEO, who by HIS OWN DOING, lacks any credibility. He has lied to investors, either blatantly or by omission. And absolutely failed in his fiduciary duty to act in the shareholders best interest. Lied by omission by not telling people the machine was broken in 2013, lied numerous times about holding a SHAREHOLDERS MEETING, lied and then redirected funds he said he would use to fix the processor. Failed to honor commitments to vendors who,have been owed money for nearly six years.

But we are told that the biggest problem is the NSS and evil crews wanting to do the company harm. And once a deal is done, vindication will occur.

Is it that hard to step up and admit this is wrong???

---