Strikeforce is 2FA but better and more 1) OOB/M

Strikeforce is 2FA but better and more

1) OOB/MFA Patents:
a) https://www.google.com/patents/US7870599
b) https://www.google.com/patents/US8484698
c) https://www.google.com/patents/US8713701

2) Keystroke Encryption patents:
a) https://www.google.com/patents/US8566608
b) https://www.google.com/patents/US8732483
c) https://www.google.com/patents/US8973107

demos
▪ ProtectID (OOBA, MFA, 2FA)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL445384E935D9CB45
▪ MobileTrust (mobile device anti-keylogger)
https://youtu.be/11szu5L2FJU
▪ GuardedID (desktop anti-keylogger)
https://youtu.be/qJyfD2IKsww
▪ GuardedID & MobileTrust demos from a vendor
https://www.theshoppingchannel.com/Computer-A...E:12258390

Patent infringement case in appeal with additional US Patent Office, PTAB, and SCOTUS info supporting the case.
1. On March 16, 2017, StrikeForce sued SecureAuth in the Eastern District of Virginia for willfully infringing the Asserted Patents. Treble damages may be awarded for willful patent infringement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treble_damages

2. (case law) Strikeforce Technologies with legal team of Ropes and Gray in the USPTO Court (PTAB) won all challenges to StrikeForce's IP on October 17, 2017.
https://jumpshare.com/v/8edDCebJyRqat1hn4s6p

3. SecureAuth in December 2017 won a dismissal by basically saying the patent is not valid because of the Alice 101. This is the opposite of what the USPTO (PTAB) had ruled two months earlier on October 17, 2017.
http://www.patentdocs.org/2016/05/section-101...klash.html

4. The dismissal was appealed, and the other infringement cases were stayed.

5. As pointed out in Rope's and Gray's appeal brief from March 26, 2018, the lower court made a number of mistakes.
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4985879

6. (case law) Then the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled on April 24, 2018 in a 7 to 2 decision that the USPTO has the Constitutional Right to decide the validity of a patent.
https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1013951 (The USPTO had already validated StrikeForce's patents on October 17, 2017.)

7. In the appeal reply brief by SecureAuth's attorney on May 7, 2018
https://jumpshare.com/v/qGPBC944xOGw8FIn1o6B

8. The Strikeforce reply to the SecureAuth brief was filed June 4, 2018.
https://jumpshare.com/v/DTfcX8CMb23MRwOG01GX

9. The process is moving along. June 11, 2018 ▪ SFOR Appendix is filed for Appeal of SFOR vs. SecureAuth
https://jumpshare.com/v/tDD65VB293l4so6Q8f3Y
▪ Both parties (SFOR and SecureAuth) are in compliance with Rule 33 having discussed settlement
• https://jumpshare.com/v/D9znqgHlxjcMstBLBIcu
• http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/fi...2.2017.pdf

10. (case law)
▪ June 13, 2018 The Federal Circuit on Wednesday upheld a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision that rejected challenges to three Transocean patents. Just days after hearing arguments, the appeals court affirmed, without explanation, the PTAB’s 2017 decision that Seadrill Americas Inc. failed to show parts of three Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. patents were invalid. https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1053315/fe...ampaign=ip
▪ June 20 & 21, 2018 More affirmation of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board rulings by the Federal Circuit
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5098926
▪ June 22, 2018 US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) rules that patent holders can recover damages from overseas infringement of their patents. https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1047357

11. At this stage the possibilities may include; a decision, oral arguments, and mediation. If oral arguments are scheduled, they may appear here http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/argument/upcomin...-arguments




Additional reading
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5091407

There are no guarantees in investing. No one should consider these pages or posts to be financial advice. Everyone has a responsibility to verify and thoroughly learn more than what is referenced or written here, and everyone must take responsibility for their own investing decisions.