You said “shorts post lies to pump the stock”,

You said “shorts post lies to pump the stock”, which means more buying. Then you contradicted yourself by saying “shorts trying to discourage investors by showing they are in control“, which means less buying. So which one is it?

Aspire has been the #1 reason for the recent decline, even if you don’t admit it. Of course I don’t just say it like you, I have math to back it up.

For example, from April 1, 2018 to May 9, 2018, the selling pressure by Aspire was:

8M shares / 28 days = 285,714 shares/day

Here’s more math.

https://m.investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4963550

I explained why Aspire is more likely to sell than hold here.

https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4976634

You still haven’t answered why didn’t Leo tell investors his company is controlled by the shorts if it’s good for the stock.