But why put it in the 4/30 filing that LAM still i

But why put it in the 4/30 filing that LAM still is still owed $65,000 if they had already been paid in shares and it was up to LAM to decide whether or not they sell the shares? I don't think it's LAM's responsibility to inform ONCI that it's actually sold the shares.


Guess we will have to wait another three months to determine who was right here. Thanks for your assistance Pred.