You state everyone knows they are working on a deal so again, how does one come to know this fact when there is nothing to illustrate this so called fact? What deal are they working on? They have no money, not enough to pay for a phone line. They lost one million on the Songbird fiasco. Tony has remained quiet choosing instead to use the website rather than an 8k to inform shareholders. Tony can lie on the website but he cannot lie on an 8k, so he chooses not to file an 8k. Again how does everyone know they are working on a deal? Because Tony says so? He also said financials were complete and to be filed but that also proved to be a lie. When one invests it should be not in the absence of fact but rather in the disclosure of facts. I have an ethically based belief the system should be fair and transparent but we know this of course is Utopian thinking. The reality is facts are twisted, absent, and misrepresentative of the reality and insiders use these tools to transfer wealth to themselves rather than investors who believe the system to be fair and equitable. Mit is even worse when message boards which should serve the truth rather than a select few put investors at risk by denying them facts. One cannot do due diligence in the absence of required filings and though message boards should not be relied upon for facts, they should serve as a springboard for research. But with only one side being allowed even this limited source is used to manipulate the share price a la papa nasty, who did this twice in fifteen months.
Knock yourself out mogul buying shares so if message boards serve no real purpose upon which to make a decision, why do you post and why are contrarian messages, though factual, are removed?