thought it was obvious .. beyond the risk of being

thought it was obvious .. beyond the risk of being in the only pubco in this sector
there are a few currently for those disposed to it .. not everyone will be ..

.. one thing *most* can learn from patterns (not just NR) is what gets done ..

P2O's CEO announced BoD intent .. 18 months b4 being seated ..

RC (as i've noted numerous times) .. having organized investors previously for a private competitor's implementation .. is another potential reason for some to dip their toe ..

the potential for both the plant and the blending site actually being sold .. is a 3rd

regardless .. mgmt has to articulate and execute .. i've noted since 2014 .. that mgmt has a communication issue .. it is less than ideal *imo* .. and can be solved imo rather easily ..

i've always noted that the only aspect actual investors control is whether they buy sell or hold their PTOI *shares* .. in alignment with their respective DD .. the irony there of course is so many (not all) are invested from P2O's very early days as a pubco

and that is NRs' *biggest* dilemma .. where PTOI (stock) is concerned

i remain invested because of the *founder's interest* and the BoD being seated

and like a few other P2O investors .. will see this outcome thru to the end

ever notice that those who do diversify .. don't whine about investing strategies


4kids

Quote:

---

That’s answer didn’t answer my question...looking for reasons why an investor would 8nvest in the company after doing their due diligence...

See, IMO, if the NSS theory that some “play off of” had any major impact, there would be ALOT of wealthy retail investors. Since I don’t see that...my guess is that it’s not good investing strategy.

---