Thank you for displaying your educational shortcom
Post# of 119686
![](/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
The Scientific American is NOT part of any 'deep state'. That's just more conspiracy theory shit that you NEED to believe. It's your 'catnip'.
Neither the words 'probably' nor 'may' undercut the main arguments that better diagnostics, educational resource/incentives, older parents and more surviving preemies are FAR more persuasive reasons for more reporting of autism than your non-existent scientific evidence to support bat-shit theories about vaccines as CAUSITIVE agents for autism.
Go back to 'hammering your nail'. 'World Mercury Project', my ass!
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)