Analyze the import of how Ropes & Gray evaluated t
Post# of 82665
'This Court forbids treating one claim as representative where it does not include limitations found in other claims.
See Berkheimer v. HP Inc., 991 F.3d 1360, 1365-66 (Fed. Cir. 2018).
Accordingly, it is improper to determine eligibility of over 40 claims across three patents using a single claim that does not, at least in SecureAuth’s characterization, reflect meaningful limitations in other claims. At minimum, the court should have separately analyzed at least claim 1 of each Asserted Patent'[/b].
They used the term IMPROPER as the description of what occurred in the District court.
They also state that the Appeals Court FORBIDS it!!!!!!
WOW!!!