Read the Internal Operating Procedures of the US C
Post# of 82677
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/fi...aster2.pdf
"Consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 34 and Fed. Cir. R. 34, it is the court’s policy to allow oral argument unless :
(a) The appeal is frivolous; or
(b) The dispositive issue or set of issues recently has been authoritatively decided ;
or
(c) The facts and legal arguments are presented adequately in the briefs and record, and the decisional process would not be aided significantly by oral argument."
Here's why I think oral arguments won't likely happen. What is more authoritative than a S.C.O.T.U.S. decision? Here's the connection for newbies.
The S.C.O.T.U.S. made rulings in April 2018 , that IMO validated the PTAB and USPTO which had earlier validated the patents of SFOR (Strikeforce Technologies) in October 2017

