For SA it would be an anal argument IMHO. It would

For SA it would be an anal argument IMHO. It would be their lawyer's gambit to delay the inevitable by making a complete and utter a$$ of himself before the three judges. We've all read their legal arguments. They're laughable to say the least! At this point, the realistic goal for them is to stall so as to delay settlement payment until after 1 July. Then at least their 2Q18 fins will not be a disaster in the eyes of their SHs.