https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/1...notek.html
Ask yourself this question that I did ask myself:
Does a man of this caliber highly sought after by many security firms, join a new OTC pinky stock that has NO revenue contracts when he joined; if there is not something of earth shattering significance to that patent that they filed?
Why did he fly to Finland to talk to Lauri about the Parano protocol, if it was just a farce, Why was he so impressed that he turned down all other offers to become CEO of a tiny company with no revenue contracts?
What was Micks opinion of the protocol?
Here are some quotes from Mick Davis on Parano and Paranotek:
“Our solution is not network-centric, nor system-centric, it's data-centric. The smallest piece of the puzzle that we all share is data. We're protecting data, not the system, not necessarily the network(that's a fundamental flaw in which most solutions are architected).
Most (Cybersecurity) systems today use encryption, but they use encryption that was designed thirty years ago and now with quantum computing...quantum computing can actually break, like a code breaker, encryption so all of our banking, all of our passwords, all of our credit information is going to be exposed.
We are looking at a post-quantum, computing encryption methodology which is very complex so post-quantum computers can't actually break the code.”
"It's Horribly Exciting, and it's frightening honestly because part of the challenge of being an overnight success is that it's taken 30 years of research and experience and exploration to understand what is possible to become an overnight success in this particular protocol."
-Mick Davis, CEO of Paranotek
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mickdavis
A very credible guy put his name on the patent filed
https://www.linkedin.com/in/korth/
I think the answer to those questions are that WRFX has an enviable/ patentable product that companies and governments the world over want. & I want to own a lot of shares in this Baby about to be a giant.
Go WRFX !!!
Ask yourself this question that I did ask myself:
Does a man of this caliber highly sought after by many security firms, join a new OTC pinky stock that has NO revenue contracts when he joined; if there is not something of earth shattering significance to that patent that they filed?
Why did he fly to Finland to talk to Lauri about the Parano protocol, if it was just a farce, Why was he so impressed that he turned down all other offers to become CEO of a tiny company with no revenue contracts?
What was Micks opinion of the protocol?
Here are some quotes from Mick Davis on Parano and Paranotek:
“Our solution is not network-centric, nor system-centric, it's data-centric. The smallest piece of the puzzle that we all share is data. We're protecting data, not the system, not necessarily the network(that's a fundamental flaw in which most solutions are architected).
Most (Cybersecurity) systems today use encryption, but they use encryption that was designed thirty years ago and now with quantum computing...quantum computing can actually break, like a code breaker, encryption so all of our banking, all of our passwords, all of our credit information is going to be exposed.
We are looking at a post-quantum, computing encryption methodology which is very complex so post-quantum computers can't actually break the code.”
"It's Horribly Exciting, and it's frightening honestly because part of the challenge of being an overnight success is that it's taken 30 years of research and experience and exploration to understand what is possible to become an overnight success in this particular protocol."
-Mick Davis, CEO of Paranotek
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mickdavis
A very credible guy put his name on the patent filed
https://www.linkedin.com/in/korth/
I think the answer to those questions are that WRFX has an enviable/ patentable product that companies and governments the world over want. & I want to own a lot of shares in this Baby about to be a giant.
Go WRFX !!!
