Some reflection is needed....OK, allow me to refle
Post# of 96897
(Total Views: 540)
Posted On: 05/24/2018 12:25:54 PM
Re: Lightning1 #90449
Some reflection is needed....OK, allow me to reflect.
When you first signed up under THIS username/alias, you claimed to be 'Gomez' and the story you tried to sell people here was that "you forgot your password" and that is why you signed up with a new alias. What you didn't know at that time was that I, an NTEK moderator here on iHang knows 'Gomez' in person. I played along with your claim and gave you a simple 3 question quiz to allow you to confirm that you are indeed Gomez as you claim. What happened next? You failed that quiz miserably. At that point, your credibility was ruined. Your account was limited because you proved to be a trouble maker here.
Now, I want to remind you that while an alias is meant to protect anonymity, it does not give you the right to impersonate people. Faking social media accounts could lead to criminal charges.
See this article:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime...arges.html
I think you should be banned here at a minimum, but more so, I think you should prosecuted for impersonating someone that you are not. You can have your opinion about me trying to be "God", but it's really just a simple case of a moderator having a healthy set of ethical principals. If I see someone impersonating someone I know personally and I am a moderator of that forum, what would you expect me to do? Ignore it as if it didn't happen?
All of these instances are well documented so you can deny them all you want, however, the evidence will contradict your denial.
You may have fooled some people on this forum, but you certainly have not fooled me.
When you first signed up under THIS username/alias, you claimed to be 'Gomez' and the story you tried to sell people here was that "you forgot your password" and that is why you signed up with a new alias. What you didn't know at that time was that I, an NTEK moderator here on iHang knows 'Gomez' in person. I played along with your claim and gave you a simple 3 question quiz to allow you to confirm that you are indeed Gomez as you claim. What happened next? You failed that quiz miserably. At that point, your credibility was ruined. Your account was limited because you proved to be a trouble maker here.
Now, I want to remind you that while an alias is meant to protect anonymity, it does not give you the right to impersonate people. Faking social media accounts could lead to criminal charges.
See this article:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime...arges.html
I think you should be banned here at a minimum, but more so, I think you should prosecuted for impersonating someone that you are not. You can have your opinion about me trying to be "God", but it's really just a simple case of a moderator having a healthy set of ethical principals. If I see someone impersonating someone I know personally and I am a moderator of that forum, what would you expect me to do? Ignore it as if it didn't happen?
All of these instances are well documented so you can deny them all you want, however, the evidence will contradict your denial.
You may have fooled some people on this forum, but you certainly have not fooled me.
(11)
(0)