He purposely has bad grammar, first warning sign.

He purposely has bad grammar, first warning sign. I didn’t trust his upset story and now trying to flip flop is a second warning sign. Why he responded to my message regarding why I thought there was a flaw in the theory against the “non existent application” just because I included the pen to prove my point is the third warning sign and three strikes he’s out. His story spun off him claiming he told company about his family needing medical pen as if he thinks he is portraying a unique situation.

I am just waiting for him to strategically rant a story about how the company is delaying his pen after telling him a couple weeks, even though he originally claimed the company said possibly a couple weeks. The whole thing is highly suspect at the least and consider this calling him out on it. He is most likely one of the bidsitter recipients of the defendants when they strategically sell to lower share price.