or they are embeds .. long since seeded into various SMBs .. because both sides of NRs' POV have *presence* (PRO and CON)
what i find so telling is the inability of *some* to recognize NRs' cycles of money always in play .. until every ounce of NRs' *injected* liquidity is gone which
NR is damn close to and why i keep noting NR is close to triggering reg sho
years back 70c was key .. imo NR does everything specific to *reporting* on a % basis
which is why imo it's pretty easy to ascertain IPIX's abusive short
everyone can see what transpired in the summer of 2015 re: IPIX (CTIX)
most can acknowledge the PPS *run up* on *volume* (90day 500k+) of late 2014 and well into 2015 on the *flip* back down and the decreasing volume
IPIX has been worked down non stop since early 2015
one aspect most forget re: *legal shorting* is if one shorts they do so by number of shares
and the same number of shares has to be *covered* .. which is why volume can be a rather telling indicator .. and volume is comprised of *trades*
but the key here besides the *volume* avgs which always tell the tale .. is what NR had to *report* re: legal after mgmt's upside surprise of June 2017 .. their *legal* short that had taken NR 2 years (2015 to 2017) to get back to 850k/875k .. ramped upward from May 2015 to just under 1.5M about 6/8 weeks later
875,733 to 1,037,384 to 1,161,877 to 1,234,237 to 1,458,432
http://otce.finra.org/ESI
as i noted earlier today .. it is not surprising to see what has been done by NR since 2.22.18 to today
they are in a hole of their own making (for years now) and they desperately need *shares* out of retail
embeds also normalize the abnormal which is another *tell*
curious to see if NR can do *volume* follow thru on IPIX tomorrow or Friday
4kids
what i find so telling is the inability of *some* to recognize NRs' cycles of money always in play .. until every ounce of NRs' *injected* liquidity is gone which
NR is damn close to and why i keep noting NR is close to triggering reg sho
years back 70c was key .. imo NR does everything specific to *reporting* on a % basis
which is why imo it's pretty easy to ascertain IPIX's abusive short
everyone can see what transpired in the summer of 2015 re: IPIX (CTIX)
most can acknowledge the PPS *run up* on *volume* (90day 500k+) of late 2014 and well into 2015 on the *flip* back down and the decreasing volume
IPIX has been worked down non stop since early 2015
one aspect most forget re: *legal shorting* is if one shorts they do so by number of shares
and the same number of shares has to be *covered* .. which is why volume can be a rather telling indicator .. and volume is comprised of *trades*
but the key here besides the *volume* avgs which always tell the tale .. is what NR had to *report* re: legal after mgmt's upside surprise of June 2017 .. their *legal* short that had taken NR 2 years (2015 to 2017) to get back to 850k/875k .. ramped upward from May 2015 to just under 1.5M about 6/8 weeks later
875,733 to 1,037,384 to 1,161,877 to 1,234,237 to 1,458,432
http://otce.finra.org/ESI
as i noted earlier today .. it is not surprising to see what has been done by NR since 2.22.18 to today
they are in a hole of their own making (for years now) and they desperately need *shares* out of retail
embeds also normalize the abnormal which is another *tell*
curious to see if NR can do *volume* follow thru on IPIX tomorrow or Friday
4kids
Quote:
Shorts have major problems with IPIX, no question about it. Those denying that abusive naked shorting is in play need to do some DD on the subject.
Longs continue to steadfastly accumulate and with each passing day the base becomes more edjucated. Denial is futile. Looking forward to Leo dropping bombs on the criminals from which there will be no escape. Our company has the potential to play a huge role in exposing the criminal elements presently operating with impunity. Anyone against this happening? GO IPIX!!!
5
