i'm not implying that you are part of the crew ..

i'm not implying that you are part of the crew ..

i'm specifically referencing what has been trotted over *here*
by others who posted it *there* ..

my expectation was that P2O investors would see a Shareholder Update out of mgmt

it didn't come to pass .. and imo reflects on RH's skill sets re; *communication*
something i've opined on since 2014

my next expectation is that the Q gets filed .. imo it's 50/50 if filed with an NT
(which again embeds *there* are salivating over and have been since CFO's departure)
if filed on time .. imo it will have come about with the aid of the former CFO

i come back to what matters to me re: my *significant* investment in P2O via PTOI

founder's holdings and LB remaining on P2O BoD

founder retaining 3M~ PTOI shares has influence over a significant *group* of P2O investors

which is one reason why *volume* always matters

4kids

Quote:
crew would like to imply that an NT will be filed


I don't consider myself part of "the crew".... just a shareholder who had expectations of a certain measure of success....not the "whole enchilada"....just some reasonable measure of it....and even that has fallen considerably short of the mark...I think it would be reasonable to measure our expectations and communicating those based on recent historic results/events...without being categorized...one way or the other as to our positions shareholders/crew..... That relationship has amounted to nothing...nobody is buying...nobody is selling...so whatever is put in print on SMBs has no impact in any way on PTOI's SP or P2O's progress. Volume and interest is dismally pathetic....compliments of RH. time and time again....so...an NT sounds "par for the course" to me