So the general logic here is that too many people
Post# of 43064
If anyone listens to someone claiming to be a savant who detects a large naked short position where not even FINRA knows, I strongly suggest you make that person show you evidence or at least describe the logic which led her to believe such a large naked short position exists. If it turns out to be more gobbledygook and you're pinning your hopes on that 'fact' that the alleged naked shorts will eventually have to cover, you could be in for a long ride if those shorts turn out to be fictional characters.
Likewise, PTOI founder Mr. Bordynuik disposed of most of his shares. You can read the court documents where he admitted to selling a large number of shares at a time when PTOI was trading at about $1.40. That's in addition to paying himself a generous salary out of invested funds. So he held on to some shares and rode them down to $0.03 rather than selling the rest...he didn't fleece investors as much as he could have so therefore he must believe in PTOI?!? Why the strong focus on who may still believe rather than wondering why Mr. Heddle won't provide any evidence of the processor's value?? Your fellow shareholders also believe but that hasn't made a processor provide a stitch of value.
Think things through, investors. I'm not asking you to believe me--just think it through. If you get a chance, look at the price of scrap plastic vs. the price of diesel to see if you can make PTOI's numbers work--they don't work. You can go broke listening to sweet nothings but thinking things through will pay dividends here.
.