OK, so my first reply did not go through. First of

OK, so my first reply did not go through. First off elsie, bloody or otc, whatever your new or old moniker is, you are bringing up outdated posts by the company from 11 years ago!!!! CAN YOU GIVE US A CLUE AS TO WHAT PLANET YOU ARE ON??? I did not hear about this company until late 2008, researched the direction and co for several months and decide to take a risk and invest. I'm very satisfied with my choice currently and only see an upside with the progression of recent updates, not past updates from 11 years past,
Common, is that all you got???
Since your !st post your agenda was obvious, Inquire, question, cast doubt and then begin the bashing process. SOP for your kind and blatantly obvious. What a joke!!!
This company has proven through conuinued reseach and developement that products have been developed, researched, tested and refined to such an extent that the product patents have been applied for, reviwed and accepted by the EU and paid for by Nanologix, Other patent pending and approvals pending.
I cannot fathom how, in good conscience, such persons as yourself, continue to attept to downplay the company attempting to provide a product that has such an economical, accurate, fast diagnostic product that can save and benefit so many others who would not otherwise have such a resourse available to thier medical professionals.
Sure, bash me with a 2007company update.