The way I read that is that the Texas lawsuit has
Post# of 22465
(Total Views: 379)
Posted On: 04/30/2018 4:16:26 PM
The way I read that is that the Texas lawsuit has been terminated, but the Kansas & Florida lawsuits are still ongoing.
Looking at the details of these alleged contract infractions, it seems to me that most of these charges against QMC should rightly come under the heading of 'malicious prosecution' & be subject to a counter-suit for damages to that effect. I don't know if 'malicious prosecution' can be invoked in private lawsuits &/or jurisdictions with somewhat dubious legal systems (like Kansas & Florida from what I've read), but it sure as hell seems warranted in these cases. I've heard 9/10ths of the law is supposed to be based on 'intent' & you'd have to be deaf & blind not to see the insidiously corrupt intent at the core of these micro-technicality-based complaints. The incredible assertions that a pre-payment penalty is due because they paid on a Friday, when it was due on a Saturday....or a late charge penalty because they paid on a Monday instead of the Sunday due date are beyond belief. Both of these payments were obviously made in good faith & in keeping with 'traditional' next business day banking procedures in-mind....despite the catch-all (loan shark) wording in the original loan instruments that dictated the 'exact' day. I hope that among their many victims somewhere in time, these sharks are shown how to take a long walk on a short pier.
Sidenote; That note about dropping QMCs' once-highly-prized TQD patent rights kinda blew me away.
Looking at the details of these alleged contract infractions, it seems to me that most of these charges against QMC should rightly come under the heading of 'malicious prosecution' & be subject to a counter-suit for damages to that effect. I don't know if 'malicious prosecution' can be invoked in private lawsuits &/or jurisdictions with somewhat dubious legal systems (like Kansas & Florida from what I've read), but it sure as hell seems warranted in these cases. I've heard 9/10ths of the law is supposed to be based on 'intent' & you'd have to be deaf & blind not to see the insidiously corrupt intent at the core of these micro-technicality-based complaints. The incredible assertions that a pre-payment penalty is due because they paid on a Friday, when it was due on a Saturday....or a late charge penalty because they paid on a Monday instead of the Sunday due date are beyond belief. Both of these payments were obviously made in good faith & in keeping with 'traditional' next business day banking procedures in-mind....despite the catch-all (loan shark) wording in the original loan instruments that dictated the 'exact' day. I hope that among their many victims somewhere in time, these sharks are shown how to take a long walk on a short pier.
Sidenote; That note about dropping QMCs' once-highly-prized TQD patent rights kinda blew me away.
(1)
(0)