Both mits and my replies to your 1st posting clear

Both mits and my replies to your 1st posting clearly indicate we thought you were representing otcmarkets.com-though i thought it was very bizarre-had never happened before-and you did nothing to dissuade of that belief,even when i posted another post to you based on that belief -that was DISHONEST.

When the great recession destroyed my best friends company,he got into pennies and made a 40 fold return in 6 months -before bashers and 'destroy these companies' political orders took over. He kept begging me to get into it w him so he could avoid foreclosure on his house built just before the recession, which big stores thought was armageddon and mothballed projects 90% complete.

I had to pick a moniker to access these boards, not thinking i would be posting at the time- microcaps was a logical name reflecting the companies my friend was making his money on and it was the great recession-not a bullmarket--and unlike your moniker -especially in response to the content of my post which was your 1st post-my moniker was not intended to and did not deceive-nor did i lead people to believe i was representing some organization, let alone relevant to these pennies.

"Although I've always found water boarding to be a unique and highly effective method, I have yet to be properly trained in successfully executing it". Very strange! Sounds like you want to learn it.

Both mits and i and many other longs were invested in NNLX LONG BEFORE THE PRESENT BULLMARKET ,so your statement that its crazy to be invested in NNLX now is DISHONEST and reveals your intent to naysay NNLX -certainly not a long.

Since our investments both preceded 2012,it obvious we both knew NNLX was operational in the sense you use-so without looking it up u are obviously misrepresenting what mits said-mits context obviously meant sales-as your post admits-in opposition to the PREVIOUS company,which was NOT the same company-wholesale change in directors etc plus different products -which, in context, was one of mits primary points i believe-since i cant see his post while writing this-

and the wording of infetech's 10q's talks about royalties apparently as something different than pure sales-but i wasnt going to waste more time by delving into that

again, your last sentence apparently betrays you as a shorter,for "why[would] someone would find interest in a low revenue generating business during a bull market. I like earning a return on my investment."

you obviously think longs are stupid-you MISREPRESENT bc many longs here,including myself,at the prodding of another trading friend entered DURING the great recession
what is stupid is picking a fight w the moderator

you obviously dont think much of NNLX product

you miss the point in mits and my and others posts- that the game changing direction-final steps to monetize the patents in 14-21 countries,plus grant apps-is whats important,not past or even present financials.The point is to have products and especially game changing products,as NNLX does,which will then lead financials.
Since you focused on the minor in the same way our favorite aunt does,it made me wonder whether this was just another moniker of a current or past basher,who never gets the point.

Btw, neither my knowledge nor investment is limited to microcaps -a moniker chosen in the beginning as explained ,nor did i find blue chips to be much more logical- e.g walmart bombed one time even though they beat both targets-there were even articles saying that doesnt make any sense-and it didnt.

After steve jobs died -and he wasnt just a ceo but a visionary creator of apples products,apple illogically ca tripled in price,as if investors were rejoicing that he died,at which time brokers urged me to buy -saying it would go to 1000,- i said, no way -makes no sense, and sure enough apple then lost many of their illogical gains.