So, by your confirmation that Rich Girl was right
Post# of 8054
So, by your confirmation that Rich Girl was right in her guess of a ship arrival to pick up ore ca June 7, you are indicating they are working long hours preparing and trucking a load for shipping w ship to arrive ca June 6? Which would be a very tight bidding process/trucking schedule heretofore unseen-not to mention that unforeseen stoppages could occur w the trommel in its trial run.
But there is already, as per previous reported emails (to rrr1 and others) and independent pics, 80k tons of ore at the port thats been waiting for a Panamax for a long time-the ca 36k tons of order 3 trucked from Oct 24 to Dec-which CWRN wanted picked up before Christmas, the 24k tons of order 4 trucked sometime in Jan and or Feb, and the apparent -according to a recent posted by somebody else email-20k tons of order 5-which was trucked in March (as seen by CWRN supplied and independent pics)-all of which CWRN previously indicated would be picked up by the NEXT ship-a Panamax- which we are still waiting for.
Independent pics showed running out of room at port to truck more ore ca Mar 21 unless the huge pile of scrap metal next to CWRN's huge pile of ca 80k tons was picked up since then-and none of our port ship watchers have reported a bulk ship to do that or to pick up CWRN's ore and all known inquiries re shipping have gone unanswered.
I dont see a bulk ship anywhere in the time frame according to Rich Girl or Sunnybanks ship schedule sites-and they would first have to pickup the ca 80k tons ore from orders 3-5 already trucked-in order to make room for the trommel processed product -unless the port is being bypassed or supplemented w barge storage and there will be 2 ships in the near future.
Unless the fertilizer is going to China also,only the sinter feed stock would be going to China -so is the tonnage of the sinter feed stock already known prior to trommel processing-as it would have to be to schedule a ship before the processing even began?