Elsie, No, it's speculation based upon what we
Post# of 9144
(Total Views: 541)
Posted On: 04/24/2018 10:03:20 AM
Re: elsiesyouraunt #4472
Elsie,
No, it's speculation based upon what we pay here in our labs. Some filled plates are as little as 25 cents although they have a list price of $1.00 or more. Nanologix would have to be competitive to sell into our market so my 5 to 10 cents estimate was based upon Remel and others selling price.
You want to stay with your erroneous statement of NanoLogix having to raise $30,000 for "just the EU patents"? Fine, it displays part of your intent to denigrate any action the company takes for practically any reason.
Timeline? The focus on the past reminds me of all disclaimers relating to "past results are not a guarantee of future performance". Especially with the hydrogen and all of that hype being total beach sand. I think the BNP/BNF were explained thoroughly --- they worked, but the specificity wasn't there for the BNP and the BNF color change turned out to be too subject to individual interpretation and was neither technology was machine (computer) readable. From what I've seen, the N-Assay corrects those issues and essentially combines the best attainable attributes from the two technologies, while using an ELISA, something NanoLogix had not tried before.
The EPA? Last I read about the EPA, they were planning to publish papers on the BNP and detection of waterborne contaminants. Why that hasn't happened would probably be something with that premier organization (gasp, choke) and how they do things.
Saudiis? Probably the same thing that happened with the Kuwaiti venture, the GCC companies look for Western companies to put on their mastheads and then do nothing. I looked last night for the Saudi Nasaem AlJazira company website and it looks like they may be out of business.
It's tough dealing with the Middle East. The tours I spent there were enlightening
Scott
No, it's speculation based upon what we pay here in our labs. Some filled plates are as little as 25 cents although they have a list price of $1.00 or more. Nanologix would have to be competitive to sell into our market so my 5 to 10 cents estimate was based upon Remel and others selling price.
You want to stay with your erroneous statement of NanoLogix having to raise $30,000 for "just the EU patents"? Fine, it displays part of your intent to denigrate any action the company takes for practically any reason.
Timeline? The focus on the past reminds me of all disclaimers relating to "past results are not a guarantee of future performance". Especially with the hydrogen and all of that hype being total beach sand. I think the BNP/BNF were explained thoroughly --- they worked, but the specificity wasn't there for the BNP and the BNF color change turned out to be too subject to individual interpretation and was neither technology was machine (computer) readable. From what I've seen, the N-Assay corrects those issues and essentially combines the best attainable attributes from the two technologies, while using an ELISA, something NanoLogix had not tried before.
The EPA? Last I read about the EPA, they were planning to publish papers on the BNP and detection of waterborne contaminants. Why that hasn't happened would probably be something with that premier organization (gasp, choke) and how they do things.
Saudiis? Probably the same thing that happened with the Kuwaiti venture, the GCC companies look for Western companies to put on their mastheads and then do nothing. I looked last night for the Saudi Nasaem AlJazira company website and it looks like they may be out of business.
It's tough dealing with the Middle East. The tours I spent there were enlightening
Scott
(3)
(0)