ZP, this is a very interesting development from la
Post# of 82686
(Total Views: 481)
Posted On: 04/23/2018 7:41:29 AM
ZP, this is a very interesting development from last week. The federal circuit courts are realizing that an Alice can of worms has been opened and they are wanting clarification from the USPTO.
Ropes and Gray, of course, didn't need this development or any other to squash virtually any hope of SecureAuth, their lawfirm and the 9th district court.of a non-settlement with SFOR. Many of us who have already read the March 26, 2018 Shock & Awe Appeal brief from Ropes & Gray were surprised by the resources, expertise and highest profile representatives utilized to shut the door on any SecureAuth/Knobbe Martins hope.
Ropes & Gray essentially told the IP cybersecurity world on March 26 for Strikeforce: "The reason we do not lose IP lawsuits is because we do not take on cases that we have a possibility of losing. We thoroughly researched Strikeforce's several utility patents which are the strongest the United States offers and which have been challenged by competitors twice at the United States Patent Appeal Board level and both times the competitors lost on all counts. This is why we are involved with SFOR. If you decide to mess with us in the process of collecting from you SFOR's rightful settlement dollars along with licensing fees...be careful....the Shock & Awe legal blitzkrieg that will result will be enlightening even for the Judges involved...even if they're at the Supreme court level, which will NOT be necessary for any of SFOR's cases.
Ropes and Gray, of course, didn't need this development or any other to squash virtually any hope of SecureAuth, their lawfirm and the 9th district court.of a non-settlement with SFOR. Many of us who have already read the March 26, 2018 Shock & Awe Appeal brief from Ropes & Gray were surprised by the resources, expertise and highest profile representatives utilized to shut the door on any SecureAuth/Knobbe Martins hope.
Ropes & Gray essentially told the IP cybersecurity world on March 26 for Strikeforce: "The reason we do not lose IP lawsuits is because we do not take on cases that we have a possibility of losing. We thoroughly researched Strikeforce's several utility patents which are the strongest the United States offers and which have been challenged by competitors twice at the United States Patent Appeal Board level and both times the competitors lost on all counts. This is why we are involved with SFOR. If you decide to mess with us in the process of collecting from you SFOR's rightful settlement dollars along with licensing fees...be careful....the Shock & Awe legal blitzkrieg that will result will be enlightening even for the Judges involved...even if they're at the Supreme court level, which will NOT be necessary for any of SFOR's cases.
(14)
(0)